<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Hyscience</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.hyscience.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.hyscience.com/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:www.hyscience.com,2008-10-12://2</id>
    <updated>2013-05-22T20:53:13Z</updated>
    
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.21-en</generator>

<entry>
    <title>Hyscience on a (temporary) hiatus</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2013/05/hyscience_on_a_1.php" />
    <id>tag:www.hyscience.com,2013://2.20702</id>

    <published>2013-05-22T20:43:47Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-22T20:53:13Z</updated>

    <summary>Over several years, blogging has been a high priority and we have attempted to post pertinent yet entertaining reports that expose propaganda and deceit while supporting an optimistic view of the future. Currently, however, an extended but temporary medical break is needed. We&apos;ll be back in action as soon as possible and look forward to resuming our editorial and ruckus service. Thanks for visiting! Hyscience...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Hyscience</name>
        <uri>http://www.hyscience.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Administrative" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.hyscience.com/">
        Over several years, blogging has been a high priority and we have attempted to post pertinent yet entertaining reports that expose propaganda and deceit while supporting an optimistic view of the future. 

Currently, however, an extended but temporary medical break is needed.  We&apos;ll be back in action as soon as possible and look forward to resuming our editorial and ruckus service.
 
Thanks for visiting!
 
Hyscience

        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Afghanistan: Pro-Sharia lawmakers block law criminalizing child marriage and banning prosecution of rape victims for adultery</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2013/05/afghanistan_pro.php" />
    <id>tag:www.hyscience.com,2013://2.20701</id>

    <published>2013-05-18T15:02:34Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-18T15:50:01Z</updated>

    <summary>Interestingly, just yesterday we learned that Obama&apos;s DHS Guidelines Advise Deferemce To Pro-Shariah Islamic Supremacists. Then today we learn how pro-sharia lawmakers in Afghanistan feel about child marriage and prosecution of rape victims for adultery. Robert Spencer reports at Jihad Watch:This AP story uses &quot;conservative&quot; to refer to the pro-Sharia Muslims who blocked this women&apos;s rights law. That&apos;s in accord with common journalistic practice, which refers to religious people of any religion as &quot;conservative&quot; and to more secular types as &quot;liberal.&quot; The common journalistic practice runs into a contradiction, however, with the global alliance between Islamic supremacists and the forces of the Left. That leads the mainstream media to term opponents of Sharia &quot;right-wing&quot; and even &quot;far-right,&quot; their all-purpose term to semaphore to readers that...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Hyscience</name>
        <uri>http://www.hyscience.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Islamic Fascism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Middle East News and Perspectives" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Political News and commentaries" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Religion" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.hyscience.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="700683a6cf9f7a8fffe1a5d87660f9ad.jpg" src="http://www.hyscience.com/700683a6cf9f7a8fffe1a5d87660f9ad.jpg" width="140" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" /></span>Interestingly, just yesterday we learned that <a href="http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2013/05/dhs_guidelines.php"target=_blank"">Obama's DHS Guidelines Advise Deferemce To Pro-Shariah Islamic Supremacists</a>. Then today we learn how pro-sharia lawmakers in Afghanistan feel about child marriage and prosecution of rape victims for adultery.</p>

<p>Robert Spencer <a href="http://www.jihadwatch.org/2013/05/afghanistan-pro-sharia-lawmakers-block-law-criminalizing-child-marriage-and-banning-prosecution-of-r.html"target=_blank"">reports</a> at <em>Jihad Watch</em>:<blockquote>This AP story uses "conservative" to refer to the pro-Sharia Muslims who blocked this women's rights law. That's in accord with common journalistic practice, which refers to religious people of any religion as "conservative" and to more secular types as "liberal." The common journalistic practice runs into a contradiction, however, with the global alliance between Islamic supremacists and the forces of the Left. That leads the mainstream media to term opponents of Sharia "right-wing" and even "far-right," their all-purpose term to semaphore to readers that we are bad people and decent folks should stay away from us. But that means that in the U.S., opponents of Sharia are "conservatives," while in Afghanistan, proponents of Sharia are "conservatives." If ever (and this will never happen) a counter-jihad, anti-Sharia movement arose in Afghanistan, AP's collective head would explode.</p>

<p>Anyway, note that the Sharia supremacists block a law banning child marriage. This is because Muhammad consummated his marriage with Aisha when he was 54 and she was 9, and he is the supreme example for conduct (cf. Qur'an 33:21), so his example is normative and cannot be questioned. And the law also would have prevented the prosecution of rape victims -- one of the most noxious manifestations of the fact that in Islamic law, men are not called upon to exercise any self-control at all. Their conduct is entirely the woman's responsibility. If she gets raped, it is her fault.</p>

<p>"Conservative Afghan lawmakers block legislation protecting women's rights," from the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/conservative-afghan-lawmakers-block-law-protecting-women-saying-it-is-against-islam/2013/05/18/610c62d8-bfa4-11e2-b537-ab47f0325f7c_story.html"target=_blank"">Associated Press,</a> May 18 (thanks to all who sent this in):</p>

<blockquote>    KABUL, Afghanistan -- Conservative religious lawmakers in Afghanistan blocked legislation on Saturday aimed at strengthening provisions for women's freedoms, arguing that parts of it violate Islamic principles and encourage disobedience.

<p>    The fierce opposition highlights how tenuous women's rights remain a dozen years after the ouster of the hard-line Taliban regime, whose strict interpretation of Islam once kept Afghan women virtual prisoners in their homes.</p>

<p>    Khalil Ahmad Shaheedzada, a conservative lawmaker for Herat province, said the legislation was withdrawn shortly after being introduced in parliament because of an uproar by religious parties who said parts of the law are un-Islamic.</p>

<p>    "Whatever is against Islamic law, we don't even need to speak about it," Shaheedzada said.</p>

<p>    The Law on Elimination of Violence Against Women has been in effect since 2009, but only by presidential decree. It is being brought before parliament now because lawmaker Fawzia Kofi, a women's rights activist, wants to cement it with a parliamentary vote to prevent its potential reversal by any future president who might be tempted to repeal it to satisfy hard-line religious parties.</p>

<p>    The law criminalizes, among other things, child marriage and forced marriage, and bans "band," the traditional practice of selling and buying women to settle disputes. It also makes domestic violence a crime punishable by up to three years in prison and specifies that rape victims should not face criminal charges for fornication or adultery.</p>

<p>    Kofi, who plans to run for president in next year's elections, said she was disappointed because among those who oppose upgrading the law from presidential decree to legislation passed by parliament are women.</blockquote></blockquote> Read the rest <a href="http://www.jihadwatch.org/2013/05/afghanistan-pro-sharia-lawmakers-block-law-criminalizing-child-marriage-and-banning-prosecution-of-r.html"target=_blank"">here</a>.</p>

<p>And Obama's DHS Guidelines advise giving deference to Pro-Shariah Islamic Supremacism? Is this what America voted for? Keep in mind that <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=90356&page=1#.UZedsrWG3BE"target=_blank"">eighty-three percent</a> of Americans identify themselves as Christians.  The percentage of Muslims in America is <a href="http://www.muslimpopulation.com/America/"target=_blank"">1.8</a>. The percentage of Jews in America is <a href="http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/US-Israel/usjewpop.html"target=_blank"">2.2%</a>. I'm not sure if the percentage of Muslims in America includes Barack Obama since, although he clearly favors Muslims, he <a href="http://www.examiner.com/article/it-looks-like-president-obama-is-still-a-muslim"target=_blank"">claims</a> <a href="http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2012/05/17/church-was-not-their-thing-new-audio-from-rev-wrights-shocking-interview-with-obama-book-author-ed-klein/"arget=_blank"">to be</a> a Christian. <br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Jimmy Fallon Spoof: &apos;Obama uses Buzzfeed list to distract from scandals&apos;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2013/05/jimmy_fallon_sp.php" />
    <id>tag:www.hyscience.com,2013://2.20700</id>

    <published>2013-05-18T14:43:36Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-18T14:56:04Z</updated>

    <summary>Via Charlie Spiering at The Examiner ... this Jimmy Fallon spoof put together by Jimmy Fallon and the &apos;Late Night&apos; show crew has it that despite all the White House scandals this week, President Obama is more concerned about a Buzzfeed article listing things that will make you feel old. When the president&apos;s scandals have reached the point of being late night comedy jokes, it&apos;s a sure sign that even the left &apos;is catching on&apos; to the reality of the scandal&apos;s seriousness and damage to his faux image....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Hyscience</name>
        <uri>http://www.hyscience.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="IRS scandal" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Political News and commentaries" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.hyscience.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Via Charlie Spiering at The Examiner ... this Jimmy Fallon spoof put together by Jimmy Fallon and the 'Late Night' show crew has it that despite all the White House scandals this week, President Obama is more concerned about a Buzzfeed article listing things that will make you feel old.<br/></p>

<center> <iframe width="465" height="262" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/9xSt58HO4Ao" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> </center>

<p>When the president's scandals have reached the point of being late night comedy jokes, it's a sure sign that even the left 'is catching on' to the reality of the scandal's seriousness and damage to his faux image.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Gallup Poll: Majority of American Say Benghazi, IRS Scandals are &apos;Serious Matters&apos;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2013/05/gallup_poll_maj.php" />
    <id>tag:www.hyscience.com,2013://2.20699</id>

    <published>2013-05-18T14:30:25Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-18T15:00:00Z</updated>

    <summary>According to a new poll from Gallup, 69 percent of those polled agreed that questions over the Obama administration&apos;s public response to the September 11, 2012, attack on the American consulate in Benghazi, Libya deserve more investgiation, including 52 percent who &quot;strongly agree.&quot; Bottom line: Most Americans say that the issues being raised by congressional hearings into the Benghazi terrorist attacks and the revelations that the IRS unfairly targeted conservative groups &quot;involve serious matters that need to be investigated.&quot; On the IRS scandal, even more Americans, 74 percent, agree that issue needs to be investigated more, including 56 percent who &quot;strongly agree.&quot; Gallup&apos;s Frank Newport has more: From the looks of it, Americans aren&apos;t as dumb as the White House thinks they are ... or...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Hyscience</name>
        <uri>http://www.hyscience.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.hyscience.com/">
        <![CDATA[According to a new poll from Gallup, 69 percent of those polled agreed that questions over the Obama administration's public response to the September 11, 2012, attack on the American consulate in Benghazi, Libya deserve more investgiation, including 52 percent who "strongly agree."

Bottom line: Most Americans say that the issues being raised by congressional hearings into the Benghazi terrorist attacks and the revelations that the IRS unfairly targeted conservative groups "<strong>involve serious matters that need to be investigated</strong>." On the IRS scandal, even more Americans,<strong> 74 percent, agree that issue needs to be investigated more</strong>, including <strong>56 percent who "strongly agree."</strong> 

<a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/gallup-majority-american-say-benghazi-irs-scandals-are-serious-matters_724818.html"target=_blank"">Gallup's Frank Newport has more</a>:

From the looks of it, Americans aren't as dumb as the White House thinks they are ... or wants them to be, after all.

Related: <a href="http://www.libertynews.com/2013/05/has-the-irs-scandal-awakened-a-sleeping-giant/"target=_blank"">HAS THE IRS SCANDAL AWAKENED A SLEEPING GIANT </a>
]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Must-Read Jerusalem Post Article: Obama and the &apos;official truth&apos;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2013/05/must-read_jerus.php" />
    <id>tag:www.hyscience.com,2013://2.20698</id>

    <published>2013-05-18T03:29:35Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-18T03:51:14Z</updated>

    <summary>There is no doubt whatsoever that the Obama administration targets those who oppose, criticize, expose the failure of the president&apos;s policies. This is the proven, simple, straight-forward truth that can no longer be denied ... and the Jerusalem Post helps make this clear. Here&apos;s a few excerpts to pique your interest: [...] It has hidden the jihadist motive of terrorists and information relating to known jihadists from relevant governmental bodies. The Benghazi cover-up is the most blatant example of this policy of obfuscating and denying the truth. But it is far from a unique occurrence. For instance, the administration has stubbornly denied that Maj. Nidal Malik Hassan&apos;s massacre of his fellow soldiers at Ft. Hood in Texas was a jihadist attack. And in the months...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Hyscience</name>
        <uri>http://www.hyscience.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Political News and commentaries" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.hyscience.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>There is no doubt whatsoever that the Obama administration targets those who oppose, criticize, expose the failure of the president's policies. This is the proven, simple, straight-forward truth that can no longer be denied ... and the Jerusalem Post helps make this clear.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/Column-One-Obama-and-the-official-truth-313405"target=_blank"">Here's a few excerpts</a> to pique your interest:<br />
<blockquote>[...]  It has hidden the jihadist motive of terrorists and information relating to known jihadists from relevant governmental bodies. The Benghazi cover-up is the most blatant example of this policy of obfuscating and denying the truth. But it is far from a unique occurrence.</p>

<p>For instance, the administration has stubbornly denied that Maj. Nidal Malik Hassan's massacre of his fellow soldiers at Ft. Hood in Texas was a jihadist attack. And in the months preceding the Tsarnaev brother's bombing of the Boston Marathon, and in its immediate aftermath, the FBI did not share its long-held information about the older brother's jihadist activities with local law enforcement agencies.</p>

<p>To advance its "official truth," the administration leaked information to the media about top secret operations that advanced its official narrative. For instance, top administration officials leaked the story of the Stuxnet computer virus that compromised Iranian computers used by Iran's nuclear weapons program. These stories compromised ongoing US and Israeli intelligence operations. But they advanced the administration's foreign policy narrative.</p>

<p>Conversely, as the AP scandal shows, the administration went on fishing expeditions to root out those who leaked stories that harmed the administration's narrative that al-Qaida is a spent force. In May 2012, AP reported that the CIA had scuttled an al-Qaida plot in Yemen to bomb a US airliner. The story damaged the credibility of Obama's claim that al-Qaida was defeated, and challenged the wisdom of Obama's support for the al-Qaida-aligned antiregime protesters in Yemen that ousted president Ali Abdullah Saleh in November 2011.</p>

<p>Finally, the administration has promoted its policy by demonizing as extremists and bigoted every significant voice that called that policy into question.</p>

<p>[...] In the lead-up to the 2010 midterm elections, Obama and his supportive media characterized the grassroots Tea Party movement for limited government as racist, selfish, extremist and uncaring.</p>

<p>And now we have learned that beginning in March 2010, the Internal Revenue Service instituted what can only be considered a systemic policy of discriminating against nonprofit groups dedicated to fighting Obama's domestic agenda. The IRS demanded information about the groups'ndonors, worldviews, reading materials and social networking accounts, and personal information about its membership and leaders that it had no right to receive. And according to USA Today, it held up approval of nonprofit status for 27 months for all groups related to the Tea Party movement. Some 500 organizations were victimized by this abuse of power.</p>

<p>We also learned this week that the IRS leaked information about donors to at least one nonprofit group that opposes homosexual marriage to a group that supports homosexual marriage. The latter group was led by one of Obama's reelection campaign's co-chairman. We learned that the IRS audited a university professor who wrote newspaper articles critical of fake Catholic groups that supported Obama's pro-abortion policies.</p>

<p>All of this aligns seamlessly with the Obama administration's demonization of conservative donors like the Koch brothers, and other stories of persecution of conservative donors that have come out over the past several years.</p>

<p>Last July, The Wall Street Journal's Kim Strassel reported that after the Obama campaign besmirched as "less-thank reputable"neight businessmen who supported political action committees associated with Mitt Romney's presidential campaign, one of the donors, Frank VanderSloot, found himself subjected to an IRS audit and a Labor Department investigation.</p>

<p>Finally there is the administration's discriminatory treatment of pro-Israel organizations.</p>

<p>A day after Lois Lerner, the head of the IRS department overseeing nonprofit groups, admitted the IRS had been discriminating against groups affiliated with the Tea Party movement, we were reminded of the appalling treatment that Z Street, a new pro-Israel organization that opposes Obama's policy toward Israel, received at the hands of the IRS ...</blockquote>Take the time to <a href="http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/Column-One-Obama-and-the-official-truth-313405"target=_blank"">read the whole thing</a></p>

<p>As the article notes in its closing paragraph, one can only hope that Obama's thuggish creation and corrupt defense of his "official truth" will anger, disgust -- and frighten -- all Americans ... (<em>enough that they make sure their representatives in the Congress block his agenda, policies, and executive actions until such time that he is either impeached or his term expires</em>!)<br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Caught! &apos;The IRS lied about existence of Tea Party documents to avoid FOIA request&apos;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2013/05/caught_the_irs.php" />
    <id>tag:www.hyscience.com,2013://2.20697</id>

    <published>2013-05-18T02:54:42Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-18T03:15:24Z</updated>

    <summary>It&apos;s fast becoming a gigantic hole that the IRS has dug for itself ... and it&apos;s one that is becoming way too deep for them to dig out of. Things were bad enough already, but now it has been proven that the IRS lied to avoiding filling a FOIA request of documents pertaining to the Tea Party. The Washington Free Beacon reports: Cover Up - IRS accused of hiding existence of Tea Party targeting documents: The Internal Revenue Service denied the existence of any documents related to its policy of targeting Tea Party organizations in response to a 2010 Freedom of Information Act request, even though such documents were later discovered by the IRS inspector general. The 1851 Center for Constitutional Law, a conservative nonprofit...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Hyscience</name>
        <uri>http://www.hyscience.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Political News and commentaries" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.hyscience.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's fast becoming a gigantic hole that the IRS has dug for itself ... and it's one that is becoming way too deep for them to dig out of. Things were bad enough already, but now it has been proven that the IRS lied to avoiding filling a FOIA request of documents pertaining to the Tea Party.</p>

<p>The <em>Washington Free Beacon</em> <a href="http://freebeacon.com/cover-up/">reports</a>: Cover Up - IRS accused of hiding existence of Tea Party targeting documents: <blockquote>    The Internal Revenue Service denied the existence of any documents related to its policy of targeting Tea Party organizations in response to a 2010 Freedom of Information Act request, even though such documents were later discovered by the IRS inspector general.</p>

<p>    The 1851 Center for Constitutional Law, a conservative nonprofit group, filed a FOIA request in 2010 through investigative journalist Lynn K. Walsh seeking all IRS documents related to the agencies tax-exempt division specifically mentioning the Tea Party.</p>

<p>    IRS headquarters responded in 2011 that it "found no documents specifically responsive to your request."</p>

<p>    However, the May 14 inspector general report found that the "first Sensitive Case Report [identifying Tea Party groups] was prepared by the Technical Unit" in April of 2010.</p>

<p>    The report's timeline chronicles the existence of numerous 2010 emails, memoranda, and policies related to the targeting of conservative organizations.</p>

<p>    According to the IG timeline, an email was sent on July 27, 2010 "updating the description of applications involving potential political campaign intervention and providing a coordinator contact for the cases."</p>

<p>    "The description was changed to read, 'These cases involve various local organizations in the Tea Party movement [that] are applying for exemption under 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(4).'"</p>

<p>    The IRS determinations unit developed a "be on the lookout" listing on Aug. 12, 2010, "in order to replace the existing practice of sending separate e-mails to all Determinations Unit employees as to cases to watch for, potentially abusive cases, cases requiring processing by the team of specialists, and emerging issues."</p>

<p>    The language of the listing was identical to the July 27, 2010 email.</p>

<p>    "Either IRS Headquarters was entirely incompetent in maintaining awareness of prominent policies and documents within the IRS, or it deliberately covered up the existence of anti-conservative IRS policies. Either is terrifying," Maurice Thompson, Executive Director of the 1851 Center, said in a statement. "Legal action is necessary to ensure that the IRS does not lie to taxpayers in this manner in the future."</p>

<p>[...] The revelation, which confirmed nearly a year of suspicions among conservative groups and lawmakers, has been roundly denounced as a breach of core constitutional values. </blockquote>Read the whole thing <a href="http://freebeacon.com/cover-up/"target=_blank"">here</a>.</p>

<p>Related scandal: <a href="http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/05/irs-oversight-board-admits-inappropriate-targeting-and-breakdown-of-the-processing-system/"target=_blank"">IRS Oversight Board Admits Inappropriate Targeting and Breakdown of the Processing System</a></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>US Rep Kevin Brady ( TX-R) asks, &quot;Is this still America&quot;?: IRS Official Steven Miller Responds With &quot;I Don&apos;t Think Targeting Is Wrong&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2013/05/us_rep_kevin_br.php" />
    <id>tag:www.hyscience.com,2013://2.20696</id>

    <published>2013-05-18T02:10:42Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-18T02:36:26Z</updated>

    <summary>Amazingly, Commissioner Miller of the IRS actually responded to Rep Brady&apos;s question with, &quot;I do not believe targeting against Americans is wrong.&quot; Incredible, true, but nonetheless he actually said these exact words. This is the same organization that is to going to police Obamacare ... and they think its ok to target Americans. The Obama administrator does not believe in targeting Muslims for terrorism, but his IRS official believes it is perfectly OK to target Conservatives: he Daily Mail reports: The IRS under the Obama administration painted targets on the backs of conservatives beginning in 2010, and ousted acting IRS commissioner Steven Miller apologized to the House Ways and Means Committee on Friday. But members on both sides of the aisle were furious, and castigated...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Hyscience</name>
        <uri>http://www.hyscience.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Political News and commentaries" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.hyscience.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Amazingly, Commissioner Miller of the IRS actually responded to Rep Brady's question with, "I do not believe targeting against Americans is wrong." Incredible, true, but nonetheless he actually said these exact words. This is the same organization that is to going to police Obamacare ... and they think  its ok to target Americans. <strong>The Obama administrator does not believe in targeting Muslims for terrorism</strong>, <strong>but his IRS official believes it is perfectly OK to target Conservatives</strong>:</p>

<center><iframe width="465" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ZdhWOoxWc6U" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>  </center>

<p>he Daily Mail <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2326109/Congressional-hearing-turns-IRS-smackdown-disgraced-commissioner-Treasury-Inspector-General-face-tea-party-scandal-questions.html"target=_blank"">reports</a>:<br />
<blockquote>The IRS under the Obama administration painted targets on the backs of conservatives beginning in 2010, and ousted acting IRS commissioner Steven Miller apologized to the House Ways and Means Committee on Friday. But members on both sides of the aisle were furious, and castigated him for the mismanagement and political gamesmanship the IRS engaged in on his watch.</p>

<p>Texas Republican congressman Kevin Brady had the harshest criticism for Miller.</p>

<p>'Is this still America?' he asked him.</p>

<p>'Is this government so drunk on power that it would turn its full force, its full might, to harass, and intimidate, and threaten an average American who only wants her voice, their voices heard?"</p>

<p>'The American public deserves better,' Miller agreed. But <strong>both he and J. Russell George, the Treasury Department's Inspector General for Tax Administration, insisted that no IRS employees engaged in political witch-hunting.</strong></blockquote>They have the balls to say this when <strong>ONLY CONSERVATIVES WERE TARGETED</strong>! </p>

<p>They, including their ultimate boss Barack Obama, must think the American people and their Congressmen are dumber than a box of rocks!</p>

<p>Related read: <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/miller-was-full-of-it-and-there-was-clearly-targeting-going-on-says-chris-matthews/"target=_blank"">Miller was full of it and there was clearly targeting going on says...Chris Matthews?</a></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>DHS Guidelines Advise Deferemce To Pro-Shariah Islamic Supremacists</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2013/05/dhs_guidelines.php" />
    <id>tag:www.hyscience.com,2013://2.20695</id>

    <published>2013-05-17T19:53:59Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-17T20:42:22Z</updated>

    <summary> Welcome to America under our Islamist-Muslim Brotherhood-endorsing and supporting president that places Islamic criticism of the American system of government over traditional American values and traditions. Charles Johnson reports at The Daily Caller: The Department of Homeland Security, which under Secretary Janet Napolitano has shown a keen interest in monitoring and warning about outspoken conservatives, takes a very different approach in monitoring political Islamists, according to a 2011 memo on protecting the free speech rights of pro-Shariah Muslim supremacists. In a checklist obtained by The Daily Caller entitled &quot;Countering Violent Extremism Dos and Don&apos;ts&quot; the DHS&apos;s Office of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties notifies local and national law enforcement officials that it is Obama administration policy to consider specifically Islamic criticism of the American...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Hyscience</name>
        <uri>http://www.hyscience.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.hyscience.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p> Welcome to America under our Islamist-Muslim Brotherhood-endorsing and supporting president that places Islamic criticism of the American system of government over traditional American values and traditions.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.hyscience.com/68988_471056326281871_1583881785_n.jpg"><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="68988_471056326281871_1583881785_n.jpg" src="http://www.hyscience.com/68988_471056326281871_1583881785_n.jpg" width="465" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></span></a></p>

<p>Charles Johnson <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/17/homeland-security-guidelines-advise-deference-to-pro-sharia-muslim-supremacists/"target=_blank"">reports</a> at <em>The Daily Caller</em>: <blockquote>The Department of Homeland Security, which under Secretary Janet Napolitano has shown a keen interest in monitoring and warning about outspoken conservatives, takes a very different approach in monitoring political Islamists, according to a 2011 memo on protecting the free speech rights of pro-Shariah Muslim supremacists.</p>

<p>In a checklist obtained by The Daily Caller entitled "Countering Violent Extremism Dos and Don'ts" the DHS's Office of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties notifies local and national law enforcement officials that it is Obama administration policy to consider specifically Islamic criticism of the American system of government legitimate.</p>

<p>This policy stands in stark contrast to the DHS Office of Intelligence and Analysis' 2009 memo "<a href="http://www.fas.org/irp/eprint/rightwing.pdf"target=_blank"">Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment" [pdf</a>], which warned of the dangers posed by pro-life advocates, critics of same-sex marriage and groups concerned with abiding by the U.S. Constitution, among others. ... </blockquote>Continue reading the mind-blowing, jaw-dropping <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/17/homeland-security-guidelines-advise-deference-to-pro-sharia-muslim-supremacists/"target=_blank"">rest of the report - here</a> ... and be prepared to be mad as hell at the anti-American,  Muslim-loving, bastard and his administration that the poorly informed. naive American people just put back in office for another four years.</p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="islam-is-the-solution-570x300.jpg" src="http://www.hyscience.com/islam-is-the-solution-570x300.jpg" width="465" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></span></p>

<p>Related: <a href="http://www.westernjournalism.com/obama-moving-to-criminalize-criticism-of-islam/"target=_blank"">Obama Moving To Criminalize Criticism Of Islam</a>: <blockquote>The whole "conspiracy theory" of the Obama administration being infiltrated by the Muslim Brotherhood, purging government documents critical of Islam, and seeking to criminalize the criticism of Islam is just that - a conspiracy theory - isn't it?</p>

<p>Sadly, it isn't.</p>

<p>If you simply pull back the curtain and look at what Obama has been doing in plain sight - inviting groups convicted of terrorism into the White House, having Muslim Brotherhood members within the State Department, purging training materials of anything critical of Islam - you would find that this whole "conspiracy theory" goes by another term: the truth.<br />
How America got to this point and whether we can return to that Shining City on a Hill instead of on our way to the trash heap of history remains to be seen.</blockquote><center> <iframe width="465" height="262" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/-xIzaQVXEmw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> </center></p>

<p>Read the entire article on 'Obama Moving To Criminalize Criticism Of Islam' - <a href="http://www.westernjournalism.com/obama-moving-to-criminalize-criticism-of-islam/">here</a>.<br/><br/></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Obamacare Tax Dollars Pouring Into Radical Leftist Organizations Like ACORN, MoveOn, LaRaza ...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2013/05/obamacare_tax_d.php" />
    <id>tag:www.hyscience.com,2013://2.20694</id>

    <published>2013-05-17T19:17:02Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-17T19:45:51Z</updated>

    <summary>Your Obamacare tax money is being poured into radical leftist community organizations so they can enroll the uninsured in Obamacare. The obvious end-result is that they will enroll people into the Democratic Party as well. And the Senate immigration bill does the same thing. It pays such leftist community organizations to educate immigrants on their path to citizenship and to the Democratic Party. Sara Noble writes at The Independent Sentinel:[...] Sebelius did an end-run around Congress last week and solicited funds from organizations like Enroll America to help publicize Obamacare. Enroll America management is purely political. President Anne Filipic is a White House insider who networks with community organizers. She was a DNC official before she worked on Obama&apos;s 2008 campaign in Iowa. She manages...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Hyscience</name>
        <uri>http://www.hyscience.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Political News and commentaries" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.hyscience.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="24986246.jpg" src="http://www.hyscience.com/24986246.jpg" width="130" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" /></span>Your Obamacare tax money is being poured into radical leftist community organizations so they can enroll the uninsured in Obamacare. The obvious end-result is that they will enroll people into the Democratic Party as well. And the Senate immigration bill does the same thing. It pays such leftist community organizations to educate immigrants on their path to citizenship and to the Democratic Party. </p>

<p>Sara Noble <a href="http://www.independentsentinel.com/2013/05/obamacare-tax-dollars-pouring-into-acorn-moveon-laraza/"target=_blank"">writes</a> at <em>The Independent Sentinel</em>:<blockquote>[...]  Sebelius did an end-run around Congress last week and solicited funds from organizations like Enroll America to help publicize Obamacare. Enroll America management is purely political. President Anne Filipic is a White House insider who networks with community organizers. She was a DNC official before she worked on Obama's 2008 campaign in Iowa.</p>

<p>She manages messaging for the very community organizations who are taking our money ... ACORN (exposed as corrupt but still functioning), LaRaza (the radical open borders group) and MoveOn (a radical socialist organization) are some of them. Filipic also manages the messaging for 39 Democratic members of Congress.</p>

<p>Obamacare requires these far-left community organization be hired as "navigators" to enroll the uninsured. Union members are also being hired as navigators and we know where they stand. (<em>Investors Business Daily has more on this at "<a href="http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials-viewpoint/051513-655994-sebelius-pours-taxpayer-money-into-community-groups.htm#ixzz2TXc2VG8y"target=_blank"">Sebelius Spends Your Taxes On Community Organizations</a>"</em>)</p>

<p>The corruption doesn't stop there. Community Organizations like ACORN are also involved in taking our money to set up Obamacare CO-OPs. ... </blockquote>Continue reading <a href="http://www.independentsentinel.com/2013/05/obamacare-tax-dollars-pouring-into-acorn-moveon-laraza/"target=_blank"">the whole thing</a>.</p>

<p>Saul Alinsky would be proud of Obama's subversive, tyranical, tactics!<br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Awesome Must-Watch Video: Rep. Mike Kelly Receives Standing Ovation at Ways &amp; Means Hearing on IRS Scandal</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2013/05/awesome_must-wa.php" />
    <id>tag:www.hyscience.com,2013://2.20693</id>

    <published>2013-05-17T16:47:33Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-17T18:25:25Z</updated>

    <summary>Maybe most awesome ever. GOP Rep. Mike Kelly was a huge hit at Friday&apos;s House hearing on IRS harassment of conservative groups as he skewered acting IRS commissioner Steven Miller. It was so awesome that he actually got a standing ovation: What Mike Kelly just said ... absolutely needed to be said - and more! Related video: IRS Deliberately Chose Not to Fess Up to Scandal Before Election. What&apos;s so amazing about the above video is that it came from the ultra-liberal, far-left MSNBC! Related: Why did the IRS keep the scandal quiet until after the election?...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Hyscience</name>
        <uri>http://www.hyscience.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Political News and commentaries" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.hyscience.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Maybe most awesome ever. GOP Rep. Mike Kelly was a huge hit at Friday's House hearing on IRS harassment of conservative groups as he skewered acting IRS commissioner Steven Miller. It was so awesome that he actually got a standing ovation:<br/></p>

<center> <iframe width="465" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/vCjssK-i4Mg" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> </center>

<p>What Mike Kelly just said ... absolutely needed to be said - and more!</p>

<p><strong>Related video: IRS Deliberately Chose Not to Fess Up to Scandal Before Election.</strong> </p>

<center><iframe width="465" height="262" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/p9FOsBy7-5s" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></center>

<p>What's so amazing about the above video is that it came from the ultra-liberal, far-left MSNBC!</p>

<p>Related: <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/why-did-the-irs-keep-the-scandal-quiet-until-after-the-election/"target=_blank"">Why did the IRS keep the scandal quiet until after the election?</a><br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Paul Ryan Nails IRS Commissioner During Hearing: He Admits Progressive Groups Were Not Targeted By IRS (Video)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2013/05/paul_ryan_nails.php" />
    <id>tag:www.hyscience.com,2013://2.20692</id>

    <published>2013-05-17T14:56:05Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-17T16:10:43Z</updated>

    <summary>Rep. Paul Ryan blasted acting IRS Commissioner Steven Miller today during testimony at the House Ways and Means Committee hearing. Ryan pointed out the commissioner&apos;s previous inaccurate statements to the committee. Ryan also got Miller to admit that liberal groups with progressive names were not targeted by the IRS....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Hyscience</name>
        <uri>http://www.hyscience.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Political News and commentaries" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.hyscience.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Rep. Paul Ryan blasted acting IRS Commissioner Steven Miller today during testimony at the House Ways and Means Committee hearing. Ryan pointed out the commissioner's previous inaccurate statements to the committee.</p>

<p>Ryan also got Miller to admit that<strong> liberal groups with progressive names <u>were not targeted by the IRS</u></strong>.<br/></p>

<center><iframe width="465" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/TPzwFTSXF-8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> </center>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Megyn Kelly Explodes At Liberal Guest Over Benghazi Talking Points: &apos;Come On! Can We Have Some Honesty?&apos;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2013/05/megyn_kelly_exp.php" />
    <id>tag:www.hyscience.com,2013://2.20691</id>

    <published>2013-05-17T04:12:43Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-17T04:28:04Z</updated>

    <summary>Via Mediaite: Fox News&apos; Megyn Kelly got into a contentious back and forth argument with Democratic strategist Simon Rosenberg Thursday afternoon over questions involving whether Obama administration officials deliberately misled the press and the American public on the Benghazi attack talking points. By the end of the segment, Kelly was uncharacteristically screaming at her guest to stop lying. &quot;Come on, Simon!&quot; she shouted. &quot;Can we get some honesty?&quot;...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Hyscience</name>
        <uri>http://www.hyscience.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Benghazi" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Political News and commentaries" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.hyscience.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Via <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/megyn-kelly-explodes-at-liberal-guest-over-benghazi-talking-points-come-on-can-we-have-some-honesty/"target=_blank"">Mediaite</a>: <blockquote>Fox News' Megyn Kelly got into a contentious back and forth argument with Democratic strategist Simon Rosenberg Thursday afternoon over questions involving whether Obama administration officials deliberately misled the press and the American public on the Benghazi attack talking points. By the end of the segment, Kelly was uncharacteristically screaming at her guest to stop lying. "Come on, Simon!" she shouted. "Can we get some honesty?"</blockquote><center><iframe width="465" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/7DG1IvU7hiQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></center></p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>BREAKING: Federal Judge Upholds AZ Gov. Brewer&apos;s Order Denying Licenses to Illegal Aliens</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2013/05/breaking_federa.php" />
    <id>tag:www.hyscience.com,2013://2.20690</id>

    <published>2013-05-17T04:02:40Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-17T20:43:33Z</updated>

    <summary>Via Stand With Arizona: A Federal judge on Thursday refused to halt Gov. Jan Brewer&apos;s order that denies driver&apos;s licenses for illegal aliens in Arizona who have gotten work permits and avoided deportation under Barack Obama&apos;s &quot;DACA&quot; nvirtual amnesty. The decision by U.S. District Judge David Campbell rejects the argument by immigrant rights advocates who said Brewer&apos;s policy was unconstitutional because it&apos;s trumped by federal law -- an enormous victory for Arizona and defeat for Obama, which should immediately rally other states to deny licenses as well....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Hyscience</name>
        <uri>http://www.hyscience.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Political News and commentaries" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.hyscience.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Via <a href="http://standwitharizona.com/blog/2013/05/16/victory-federal-judge-upholds-az-gov-brewers-order-denying-licenses-to-illegal-aliens/"target=_blank"">Stand With Arizona</a>: <blockquote><strong>A Federal judge on Thursday refused to halt Gov. Jan Brewer's order that  denies driver's licenses for illegal aliens in Arizona who have gotten work  permits and avoided deportation under Barack Obama's "DACA" nvirtual amnesty.</strong></p>

<p>The <a href="http://www.abc15.com/dpp/news/state/judge-refuses-to-halt-gov-jan-brewers-order-denying-drivers-licenses-for-young-immigrants"target=_blank"">decision</a> by U.S. District Judge David Campbell rejects the argument by  immigrant rights advocates who said Brewer's policy was unconstitutional because  it's trumped by federal law -- <strong>an enormous victory for Arizona</strong> and <strong>defeat for Obama</strong>, which should immediately rally other states to deny licenses as well.</blockquote></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Krauthammer Decimates Obama: &apos;President Obama Has Been Parsing Words In a Way That Makes Clinton Look Unsophisticated&apos; (Video)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2013/05/krauthammer_dec_2.php" />
    <id>tag:www.hyscience.com,2013://2.20689</id>

    <published>2013-05-17T03:40:17Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-17T04:00:50Z</updated>

    <summary>Via Scared Monkeys: Obama, it all depends on what is, is ... or iRs, is. Tonight on Special Report, Charles Krauthammer shredded Barack Obama with a thoughtful, professional and intellectual analysis of President Obama&apos;s parsing of words that makes former President Bill Clinton look unsophisticated. Krauthammer is 100% correct, the words that Obama used during his feigned outrage with the IRS scandal made anyone who was actually paying attention and listening take notice. Krauthammer said Obama was acting more &quot;Clintonian&quot; than &quot;Nixonian&quot;. Obama did not say that he did not know about the IRS actions, he said he didn&apos;t know about the IG report. However, the most damning critique may have been when Krauthammer stated, &quot;if his own counsel learns about this 3 weeks before,...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Hyscience</name>
        <uri>http://www.hyscience.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Political News and commentaries" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.hyscience.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Via <a href="http://scaredmonkeys.com/2013/05/16/charles-krauthammer-shreds-obama-president-obama-has-been-parsing-words-in-a-way-that-makes-clinton-look-unsophisticated/"target=_blank"">Scared Monkeys</a>:</p>

<p><strong>Obama, it all depends on what is, is ... or iRs, is.</strong> </p>

<p>Tonight on <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/special-report-bret-baier/index.html"target=_blank"">Special Report</a>, Charles Krauthammer shredded Barack Obama with a thoughtful, professional and intellectual analysis of President Obama's parsing of words that makes former President Bill Clinton look unsophisticated. Krauthammer is 100% correct, the words that Obama used during his feigned outrage with the IRS scandal made anyone who was actually paying attention and listening take notice. Krauthammer said Obama was acting more "Clintonian" than "Nixonian". Obama did not say that he did not know about the IRS actions, he said he didn't know about the IG report. However, the most damning critique may have been when Krauthammer stated, "if his own counsel learns about this 3 weeks before, how can the counsel ... his counsel hears about this and doesn't tell the president for three weeks about what is obviously a massive scandal?" <blockquote>"He says I didn't know about the IG report. Well if he didn't know about any of this, never heard any complaints, then he would have said I don't know anything about this at all. The IG is a peculiar answer by a guy who I have now seen for weeks now, he and his spokesman have been parsing words in a way that make Clinton look unsophisticated."</blockquote><cemter><iframe width="465" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Uo-r7pAWvgQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></center></p>

<p>Barack Obama is simply being Barack Obama ... he distorts, contorts, misdirects, misleads ... and is utterly incapable of being truthful because the truth would lead to impeachment. And yes, Krauthammer is right ... Obama speaks more 'Clintonian' than 'Nixonian' ... but he makes Nixon look like a perfectly transparent and honest president.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>No, I Didn&apos;t Make This Sh*t Up: &apos;IRS Official in Charge During Tea Party Targeting Now Runs Health Care Office&apos;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2013/05/no_i_didnt_make.php" />
    <id>tag:www.hyscience.com,2013://2.20688</id>

    <published>2013-05-17T00:58:11Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-17T03:39:00Z</updated>

    <summary>If this sh*t sounds insane, it&apos;s because it is. ABC News reports that the Internal Revenue Service official in charge of the tax-exempt organizations at the time when the unit targeted tea party groups now runs the IRS office responsible for the health care legislation:Sarah Hall Ingram served as commissioner of the office responsible for tax-exempt organizations between 2009 and 2012. But Ingram has since left that part of the IRS and is now the director of the IRS&apos; Affordable Care Act office, the IRS confirmed to ABC News today. Her successor, Joseph Grant, is taking the fall for misdeeds at the scandal-plagued unit between 2010 and 2012. During at least part of that time, Grant served as deputy commissioner of the tax-exempt unit. ......</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Hyscience</name>
        <uri>http://www.hyscience.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Political News and commentaries" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.hyscience.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>If this sh*t sounds insane, it's because it is.</p>

<p>ABC News <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/05/irs-official-in-charge-during-tea-party-targeting-now-runs-health-care-office/#.UZVjfr10R3c.twitter"target=_blank"">reports</a> that the Internal Revenue Service official in charge of the tax-exempt organizations at the time when the unit targeted tea party groups now runs the IRS office responsible for the health care legislation:<blockquote>Sarah Hall Ingram served as commissioner of the office responsible for tax-exempt organizations between 2009 and 2012. But Ingram has since left that part of the IRS and is <a href="http://www.accountingtoday.com/news/IRS-Makes-Progress-Implementing-ObamaCare-66507-1.html"target=_blank"">now the director</a> of the IRS' Affordable Care Act office, the IRS confirmed to ABC News today.</p>

<p>Her successor, Joseph Grant, is taking the fall for misdeeds at the scandal-plagued unit between 2010 and 2012. During at least part of that time, Grant served as deputy commissioner of the tax-exempt unit. ... </blockquote>Only Obama would have the balls to come up with something as obviously insanely stupid and oblivious to appearance of being coruptable as this.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>
