January 24, 2014
Now the IRS is going after conservatives in HollywoodTopics: Political News and commentaries
We've been down this same road before ,,, multiple times. A conservative group applies for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status with the IRS in full compliance of the law, but the IRS gives them the run-around for a couple of years in a process that should have taken only a few months (as it usually does for liberal groups). The IRS tax-exempt unit then starts demanding private information that isn't germane to the application, but which worries members about just why (Obama's) IRS would want this kind of information about opponents to the Obama administration. (The answer, of course, is that the Obama administration can't tolerate any legitimate opposition to its agenda, whatsoever ... and has no problem with using government agencies to target its opposition as 'enemies'.)
Although the Obama administration claims this is old news from 2010-12, and the targeting of political opponents by the IRS stopped long ago (albeit it should have never occurred in the first place), according to the New York Times, the targeting of conservative groups simply moved out west and now targets the few conservatives that are in the entertainment industry (via Ed Morrissey):
A collection of perhaps 1,500 right-leaning players in the entertainment industry, Friends of Abe keeps a low profile and fiercely protects its membership list, to avoid what it presumes would result in a sort of 21st-century blacklist, albeit on the other side of the partisan spectrum.As Ed Morrissey points out at Hot Air, the NYT piece provides a good rundown of the issue, and it's well worth reading in its entirety (its hard to believe that this actually came from the very liberal, Obama-protective, New York Times). Friends of Abe wants 501(c)(3) status so that contributor donations can be tax deductible, and that reasonably entail some scrutiny from the IRS. A 501(c)(3) cannot conduct any partisan political activity, ie, that which supports one party or a particular candidate in an election. It can, however, conduct educational efforts and champion policies.
Now the Internal Revenue Service is reviewing the group's activities in connection with its application for tax-exempt status. Last week, federal tax authorities presented the group with a 10-point request for detailed information about its meetings with politicians like Paul D. Ryan, Thaddeus McCotter and Herman Cain, among other matters, according to people briefed on the inquiry. ...
Those people said that the application had been under review for roughly two years, and had at one point included a demand -- which was not met -- for enhanced access to the group's security-protected website, which would have revealed member names. Tax experts said that an organization's membership list is information that would not typically be required. The I.R.S. already had access to the site's basic levels, a request it considers routine for applications for 501(c)(3) nonprofit status.
Friends of Abe -- the name refers to Abraham Lincoln -- has strongly discouraged the naming of its members. That policy even prohibits the use of cameras at group events, to avoid the unwilling identification of all but a few associates -- the actors Gary Sinise, Jon Voight and Kelsey Grammer, or the writer-producer Lionel Chetwynd, for instance -- who have spoken openly about their conservative political views.
[...] this is hardly a new and novel effort. Norman Lear operated People for the American Way as a 501(c)(3) for many years (although now is apparently a 501(c)(4) which donates to candidates), and that spent millions each year on "issue advocacy" in Washington DC and the states in its prior status -- and by "issue advocacy," we mean lobbying, of course. Laurie David and Leonardo di Caprio have the Natural Resources Defense Council. The entertainment industry has numerous groups of this kind, plus their ability to frame their political messages into their art, with not terribly wonderful results either economically or artistically, but the IRS doesn't seem terribly interested in these groups.Bottom line, nothing's changed, it's business as usual at Obama's IRS ... it's the same old targeting by the IRS of opponents to Obama's policies that we've been seeing since he came into office.
Why pick on Friends of Abe? The group wants to keep its membership information private, for one thing. Anyone who saw what happened to Maria Conchita Alonso can understand why. But this isn't supposed to be an issue for 501(c)(3) organizations in the first place. There isn't any requirement to make membership or donor information public, because they are proscribed from directly supporting political parties and candidates by that very status.. Yet here is the IRS stalling the application for two years, demanding access to the internal website, and asking intrusive questions that are really none of its business. It's not difficult to see this as an attempt to identify members and embarrass them -- or to intimidate them out of the political sphere altogether.
For those that need reminding, here's a little background on the initial Obama IRS Conservative Targeting Scandal (via Jim Hoft):
The previous IRS Conservative Targeting Scandal involved:Like I said in the beginning of this piece, we've been down this road before ... and apparently it's never going to end until the man in the WH acting like a Marxist-Leninist dictator leaves office.
- At least 292 conservative groups
- At least 5 pro-Israel groups
- Constitutional groups
- Groups that criticized Obama administration
- At least two pro-life groups
- A Texas voting-rights group
- Conservative activists and businesses
- At least one conservative Hispanic group
- IRS continued to target groups even after the scandal was exposed
Posted by Hyscience at January 24, 2014 8:50 AM
Articles Related to Political News and commentaries:
- Now the IRS is going after conservatives in Hollywood - Jan 24, 2014