Latest Entry: American Pravda and New York's Sixth Crime Family     Latest Comments: Talk Back Here

« Gabe The Bulldog Has Mad Skillz (VIDEO) | Main | Re: 'Education Spending Soars, Test Scores Stagnate' »

August 7, 2013

Broad U.S. terror alert mystifies experts; One calls it "Crazy Pants"

Topics:

embassy closures.png

Come to think of it, doesn't "Crazy Pants" pretty well sum up Obama's entire foreign policy?

Also, if Obama shut down just about every U.S. embassy in the M.E. over what was heard from eavesdropping on al-Qaeda leaders, why in the hell didn't he listen to REPEATED pleas from Ambassador Stevens for more support in Benghazi ... and why in the hell were STAND DOWN orders issued when our guys were pleading for help!!

Hannah Allam reports via McClatchy Washington Bureau (emphasis mine):

[...] U.S. officials insisted Tuesday that extraordinary security measures for nearly two dozen diplomatic posts were to thwart an "immediate, specific threat," a claim questioned by counterterrorism experts, who note that the alert covers an incongruous set of nations from the Middle East to an island off the southern coast of Africa.

Analysts don't dispute the Obama administration's narrative that it's gleaned intelligence on a plot involving al Qaida's most active affiliate, the Yemen-based Arabian Peninsula branch. That would explain why most U.S. posts in the Persian Gulf are on lockdown, including the U.S. embassy in Yemen, which on Tuesday airlifted most of its personnel to Germany in an "ordered departure," the government's euphemism for an evacuation.

But how, then, does it make sense for the State Department to close embassies as far afield as Mauritius or Madagascar, where there's been no visible jihadist activity? And why is it that countries that weathered numerous terrorist attacks -- Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iraq, for example -- were excluded or allowed to reopen quickly?

[...] If ordinary Americans are confused, they're in good company. Analysts who've devoted their careers to studying al Qaida and U.S. counterterrorism strategy can't really make sense of it, either. There's general agreement that the diffuse list of potential targets has to do with either specific connections authorities are tracking, or places that might lack the defenses to ward off an attack. Beyond that, however, even the experts are stumped.

Take this sampling of reactions from prominent al Qaida observers:

"It's crazy pants -- you can quote me," said Will McCants, a former State Department adviser on counterterrorism who this month joins the Brookings Saban Center as the director of its project on U.S. relations with the Islamic world.

"We just showed our hand, so now they're obviously going to change their position on when and where" to attack, said Nada Bakos, a former CIA analyst who was part of the team that hunted Osama bin Laden for years. ...

Much more here.

As a commenter on the article aptly quiped: Foreign policy is now in the hands of Susan Powers and Valarie Jarrett. Why is anyone shocked?

To which I must add ... and with Obama being their boss and surely providing them marching orders ... what else could go wrong!

Posted by Hyscience at August 7, 2013 3:19 PM



Articles Related to :