Latest Entry: American Pravda and New York's Sixth Crime Family     Latest Comments: Talk Back Here

« Marco Rubio on Obama: 'I'm Going to Give Him an F' | Main | Today's 'Where's Casey' Story »

July 19, 2011

America's financial restoration versus Barack Obama's ideology and agenda

Topics: Political News and commentaries

David Limbaugh's column today in The Washington Examiner puts America's debt crisis in simple terms that anyone but a liberal Democrat can understand: We have to have structural entitlement reform, major spending cuts and no tax increase-retardants on economic growth to reverse our current course toward national bankruptcy, but Obama steadfastly remains on the wrong side of all these solutions:

There is an overarching reason we can't move toward a balanced budget, which underscores why we face ongoing stalemates over debt ceilings and continuing resolutions: President Obama doesn't want to balance the budget.

I don't say this out of extremism or to be gratuitously controversial or even provocative. It's just that his words and actions lead to the inescapable conclusion that he is unwilling to curb his appetite for big government. In the absence of any such restraint, our alarming budget trajectory cannot be reversed. The debt ceiling may be the last clear chance before the 2012 elections to force meaningful budgetary reforms.

Obama's recalcitrance is rooted in his ideology. He has been working all his adult life toward the moment that he could transform America into a fairer place. He's not about to allow an existential threat to the nation get in the way of his obsession.

Perhaps he wishes he'd acceded to the presidency when our debt picture was less calamitous. Then he might have more leeway to work his despotic magic. Then again, probably not; without the mainly Democratic-caused housing crisis falling into his lap just in the nick of time, he might not have been elected, much less positioned to make the ludicrous demand that we spend nearly $1 trillion more to "stimulate" ourselves out of debt. Alinskyite revolutionaries feed on crises, real and perceived.

Obama fundamentally rejects the American ideals of economic liberty and equality of opportunity. He's determined to use government to redistribute and equalize incomes (and wealth, truth be told), and neither the Constitution nor catastrophic debt consequences will deter him.

He doesn't even appear worried about the debt itself, only the hassle he's getting from Republicans who are getting in the way of his spending and tax hikes. ...

Read the whole thing.

Given the fact that, as Limbaugh points out, as recently as 2010 Obama's budget more than doubled the national debt and pushed the fiscal year 2011 deficit to a record high of $1.6 trillion with record spending, which exceeded $3.8 trillion. His FY 2012 budget again called for doubling the national debt in five years and tripling it in 10 years -- without even addressing entitlements, it's hard to find fault with Limbaugh's argument that Obama couldn't care less about America's economy as long as whatever happens doesn't get in the way of his Alinskyite/Cloward-Piven agenda.

Much related: Of course the Cloward-Piven president wants the debt limit raised unconditionally!

Posted by Richard at July 19, 2011 10:46 AM

Articles Related to Political News and commentaries: