Latest Entry: American Pravda and New York's Sixth Crime Family     Latest Comments: Talk Back Here

« Sen. Lindsey Graham (R., S.C.): 'There was a referendum on this issue and the unions lost' | Main | Re: ' Egypt, Religious Freedom & Gratitude' »

February 20, 2011

In Wisconsin, a clear case of the unions vs. the people

Topics: Political News and commentaries
...what we're really seeing is the labor movement acting as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Democratic Party.
Timothy Carney's piece at The Examiner on Friday is today's must-read for all who wish to have a clear understanding of what's really going on in Wisconsin. As he aptly points out, state budgets are in crisis and the Democratic machinery is already in all-out campaign mode; war has already been declared -- and if the unions win, the people lose. For the unions, what's going on in Wisconsin is all about money, power, and control ... and their target is the taxpayers of Wisconsin.
[...] The ferment in Wisconsin is no workers' uprising against the rich and powerful. It is instead political muscle-flexing by a well-funded special interest group, which is limbering up for President Obama's re-election bid. Obama's campaign, operating as Organizing for America, is bussing protesters to the state capitol and manning phone banks to apply pressure to state legislatures. Obama himself has called Gov. Scott Walker's bill curbing government-sector collective bargaining "an attack on unions."

While liberal writers wax romantic about a workers' uprising (former Labor Secretary Robert Reich wrote on Twitter "Wisconsin is spreading to Ohio -- America's microversion of Tunisia and Egypt. People are taking to the streets to get their rights"), what we're really seeing is the labor movement acting as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Democratic Party.

Liberals and the White House try to blur the issue by lumping together government unions and labor unions in general. Obama wrongly calls Walker's bill "an attack on unions." It is, at its heart, a measure changing the way the state government procures labor -- Walker would end single-source contracts with a politically connected special interests.

Government unions in Wisconsin perfectly match the definition of "special interests," a term Obama often invokes. Four of the top six Wisconsin contributors to the 2010 elections were labor unions, with the state's teachers union giving $119,342 and the Wisconsin chapter of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees spending $83,888. The teachers union gave 96 percent of its money to Democrats, while Wisconsin AFSCME gave Democrats every penny.

Government unions spent $573,868 on Wisconsin's 2010 elections -- almost all of it going to Democrats -- while government employees spent another half million, with most going to Democrats.

Another characteristic of "special interests" is that they benefit at the expense of the public interest. Start with teachers unions that often work against students. Even setting aside the Wisconsin teachers abandoning their students last week in order to protest for higher pay and benefits, the teachers union has fought on the state level to interfere with Milwaukee's trail-blazing school choice program, which is so popular that Democrats in 2009 voted to cap the number of enrollees.

Continue reading ...

Related must-reads:
The Case Against Public Sector Unions
The case against public sector unionism
After Wisconsin, How Do Democrats Argue Against a GOP Government Shutdown?

Posted by Richard at February 20, 2011 3:19 PM

Articles Related to Political News and commentaries: