Latest Entry: American Pravda and New York's Sixth Crime Family     Latest Comments: Talk Back Here

« Rasmussen's 'Passion Index': Obama at -21 | Main | Re: Interesting Freedom of Religion Case from Israel »

September 4, 2010

CFP: The Liberal-Islamist Alliance

Topics: Political News and commentaries, Understanding Islam

New York City based writer and freelance commentator Daniel Greenfield has a must-read piece up today at Canadian Free Press that addresses the political alliance of liberal-progressives and Islamists and its possible dangerous effects to the world as we know it. Greenfields' extensive and highly informative article makes the case that the Liberal-Islamist alliance is essentially an alliance between a fifth column and the "barbarians at the gate" - and if left unchecked could very well mean the death sentence of the free world.

Here's a few excerpts to pique your interest:

The Ground Zero Mosque debate is only the latest in a long series of incidents in which liberals have chosen to side with Islamists, while denying their victims a fair hearing or any hearing at all. Opponents of the mosque are painted as "Islamophobic Extremists" representing nothing but bigotry and hate. This is much the same way that the liberal cultural elite has placed the blame for over a thousand years of Muslim persecution of Jews on "Zionist Extremism." While a Koran in the toilet becomes a front page story, the ongoing persecution of Hindus, Zoroastrians and Christians in Muslim countries is only a footnote in the State Department's human rights report.

This ugly bias is the product of a political alliance between Liberals and Islamists. And the cost of that alliance may be the world as we know it. That alliance is the reason why the US and Europe attacked Yugoslavia on behalf of a Muslim separatist group in the name of a non-existent genocide, while refusing to take any action against the very real and very horrifying Sudanese Muslim genocide of Africans. It is why Israel is constantly barraged with hateful propaganda from the same left, which defended Saddam's sovereignty in Iraq. The very same media propagandists who champion the flotilla on behalf of Hamas rule in Gaza, have next to no interest in Saddam's rape rooms, his ethnic cleansing of the Marsh Arabs, or his use of chemical weapons against the Kurds. While the American media becomes wildly exercised over a Disney employee's right to wear a Hijab or some other trivial bit of Islamic lawfare - hardly any newspaper outside of Der Spiegel has covered allegations that Turkey may be using chemical weapons against the Kurds.

... [I]t is not surprising why the Islamist agenda would appeal to liberals. It is after all also religion used as a tool of social change. Islamist groups are revolutionary, they want to overthrow the existing order in order to build a perfect society as defined by Sharia law. They operate social services centers for their followers and claim to be fighting for justice. But what liberals fail to understand is that while for them religion is a means, to the Islamists, religion is an end. Both liberals and Islamists equate religion with social justice. But for liberals, social justice is equivalent to religion, for Islamists religion is equivalent to social justice. While liberals talk about religion in order to bring about what they believe is a better society, Islamists talk about a better society in order to impose their religion on all Muslims and non-Muslims alike. If liberals were able to understand this, they might wake up long enough to realize the "deal with the devil" they had made.

The paradox of champions of equality allying with a religious cult that seeks to impose unequal rights on all seems absurd. However, this is nothing new for liberals, who have frequently allied with narrow interest liberationist groups such as the Black Panthers or La Raza, who did not believe in universal equality, but were fueled purely by racial or sectarian anger. Most have forgotten the racist origins of socialism, whether it was Jack London proclaiming, "I am a White Man first, and only then a Socialist," Marx sneering at the "Lazy Mexicans" or Woodrow Wilson and FDR promoting segregation. The socialists frequently pandered to racism, both in the US and Europe, in order to win over a working class and rural base. Then they jettisoned that base, for another, while still employing racist tactics.

Take the time to read the entire piece.

Related must-watch videos: Excellent discussion by Daniel Pipes on liberals and Islam (Part 1):


Daniel Pipes: Liberals and Islam (2 of 2)::


Other related videos: Why I left Islam - Nonie Darwish (1 of 2), (Part 2)

Suggested reading: Unholy Alliance: Radical Islam and the American Left

Posted by Richard at September 4, 2010 6:23 PM



Articles Related to Political News and commentaries, Understanding Islam: