Latest Entry: Louisiana Purchased by Reid     Latest Comments: Talk Back Here

« MSNBC Makes Correction During Broadcast After Getting Email From White House | Main | Obama's Nominee to EEOC: "Gay sex is morally good" »

October 22, 2009

Whatever you want to call them, in fact they're all communists

Topics: Political News and commentaries

Socialism/Communism, as Richard Fernandez notes in his excellent piece regarding the Roman Catholic Church's offer to admit disaffected Anglicans, is a one world faith born in Europe and the real successor to Anglicanism as the source of official piety in Britain. As I read his piece, I couldn't help but think of parallels with what is happening here in America since the "ascension" of the socialist/Marxist/liberal progressive/authoritarian/statist - Barack Obama, to the presidency, and the takeover of Congress by the far-left wing of the Democratic Party. So when I came across Laura Hollis' piece this morning, my interest in her topic was already piqued. Obama's brand of communism has become the new religion of the left and its communist-inspired secular culture is sapping the vitality and productivity out of American life.

Laura Hollis writes at Townhall that whatever you choose to call it - totalitarianism, authoritarianism, liberalism, progressivism, statism, libertarian paternalism - it is the same mindset. Like a virus, the change of name is just a mutation of the same ideas that threaten to destroy the body politic. And for those who may still harbor any doubts that Obama's basic political inclinations are communist, she suggests that one need only look at his team of "advisors":

White House Communications Director Anita Dunn is the most recent Obamirror. In the address so many have been airing recently, she offered Chinese Communist leader Mao Zedong as an inspiration to students who might need to "figure out how to do things that have never been done before." Well, golly - a man who "figured out" how to murder 70 million Chinese certainly gets points for novelty.

Before Dunn, it was ousted "green jobs czar" Van Jones, a self-admitted communist.

"Science czar" John Holdren has written of the possible need (and constitutionality) of mandatory sterilization and forced abortions to forestall whatever crisis du jour he and his colleagues Paul and Anne Ehrlich were predicting back in the 1970s (The coming ice age! Catastrophic food shortages! Death to billions!)

"Regulatory czar" Cass Sunstein has argued in favor of government regulations banning hunting and eating meat, humans representing animals in court to protect their "rights," government intervention to ensure that the "constitutional guarantee of free speech is adequately serving democratic goals," (whatever those are) and "libertarian paternalism," whereby government controls the choices you make. (Late comedian George Carlin would have had a field day with that oxymoronic suggestion.)

And none of this even mentions the laundry list of tax cheats.

These appointments are routinely characterized as amateurish leadership; examples of poor vetting. This would be laughable were it not so obviously false. How many of Obama's advisors have to be exposed as communists and Marxists before some of the duller-witted among us admit not only that there is a pattern here, but that it is deliberate, and reflects the leanings of the White House?

Connect the dots, people. It's not that Jones, Dunn, Sunstein et al were not properly vetted; it's that they were. It's not that Obama wasn't familiar enough with their viewpoints; it's that he was. These people were not chosen despite their views; they were chosen precisely because their views coincide with Obama's own. If it walks like a communist, talks like a communist, and espouses state control in the name of "the people" like a communist, it's a communist.

n February of this year, Newsweek giddily proclaimed, "We are all socialists now!" But Obama is no mere socialist. A socialist just wants your money; a communist wants complete control of your life. Some questioned the tone of my October 2008 column when I wrote it; how temperate it looks now in light of the first nine months of the Obama administration.

Obama has nationalized banks and car companies, fired the chief executive of a major corporation, appointed unaccountable ministers to set salaries for executives in private industry, castigated and threatened secured bondholders and run roughshod over their contract rights in favor of political patronage, spent nearly a trillion dollars in "stimulus" legislation that was loaded with payback and pork, proposed "cap-and-trade" legislation that will confiscate American wealth and transfer it to third world nations, many of whom are run by leftist dictators. And his pièce de résistance would be a government takeover of the entire health care industry in the United States, the crowbar by which government will be forced into every aspect of our lives from birth to death

Continue reading ...

As Laura goes on to write, anyone struggling with Obama's inconsistencies does not understand the difference between traditional liberalism and communism. The communist - like every other utopian ideologue - is always, at his core, an authoritarian. Professing to love and do all for "the people" is a transparent cover for loathing of "the people" and complete disdain for their choices, as Obama, his comrades in Congress, and his shills in the media have demonstrated toward Americans over and over again. Representative government is a farce and a façade for these people. It doesn't matter what you want; they believe that they know better than you. Such is the case with Barack Obama's communism - the religion of the secular left, and what is being wrought upon the American people.

When will the American people awaken out of their stuper!

Posted by Richard at October 22, 2009 10:13 AM



Articles Related to Political News and commentaries: