Latest Entry: Mumbai terrorists aided by CNN (Victims compromised)     Latest Comments: Talk Back Here

« Obama doesn't understand why Americans can, should, and will question his judgement (Updated) | Main | President Saul Alinsky? »

October 10, 2008

RNC Ad: The Chicago Way

Topics: Political News and commentaries
Ayers, Rezko, William Daley all make an appearance in this RNC ad (HT - RCP). The ad is running in Wisconsin and Indiana, and of course, the Internet:


Charles Krauthammer explains the significance of Barack Obama's associations. Here are a few excerpts of Krauthammer's piece with commentary by Jennifer Rubin:

Convicted felon Tony Rezko. Unrepentant terrorist Bill Ayers. And the race-baiting Rev. Jeremiah Wright. It is hard to think of any presidential candidate before Barack Obama sporting associations with three more execrable characters. Yet let the McCain campaign raise the issue, and the mainstream media begin fulminating about dirty campaigning tinged with racism and McCarthyite guilt by association. But associations are important. They provide a significant insight into character. They are particularly relevant in relation to a potential president as new, unknown, opaque and self-contained as Obama. With the economy overshadowing everything, it may be too late politically to be raising this issue. But that does not make it, as conventional wisdom holds, in any way illegitimate.

But while most of the chattering class is at a loss to understand why this matters, Krauthammer is not:

First, his cynicism and ruthlessness. He found these men useful, and use them he did. Would you attend a church whose pastor was spreading racial animosity from the pulpit? Would you even shake hands with -- let alone serve on two boards with -- an unrepentant terrorist, whether he bombed U.S. military installations or abortion clinics? . . .Second, and even more disturbing than the cynicism, is the window these associations give on Obama's core beliefs. He doesn't share the Rev. Wright's poisonous views of race nor Ayers's views, past and present, about the evil that is American society. But Obama clearly did not consider these views beyond the pale. For many years he swam easily and without protest in that fetid pond.
. . .
Do you? Obama is a man of first-class intellect and first-class temperament. But his character remains highly suspect. There is a difference between temperament and character. Equanimity is a virtue. Tolerance of the obscene is not.

And perhaps, aside from crass political concerns, this is why conservatives are beside themselves as the revelations about Obama's shady connections come forward and are blithely dismissed by the MSM rooting club. In the conservative worldview, to be judgmental and to make moral choices are central to living a decent life, let alone assuming the mantle of political leadership. Getting along or going along with evil (and make no mistake, Ayers and Dohrn were evil) or shedding one's past when proven inconvenient is a red flag, a sign of moral vapidness. It is not a political stunt to raise these matters: it is a plea for ethical standards and seriousness.

Conservative concern may be overblown, but it is worthy of consideration. And it is therefore worth pondering what other plausible alternative explanation is there for Obama's past behavior and his current slipperiness. If you can come up with one, you can rest easier that the Right's concern is misplaced.

Interestngly, The National Black Republican Association says that "After examining Obama's public record and associations, the NBRA concluded that Obama has neither the character nor judgment to be our next president." As is should be the case, when it comes to electing the next president of the United States of America, character and judgment should be first among our criteria for selection. As Krauthammer has so astutely explained and the Black Republican Association obviously agrees with, Barack Obama's associations and the judgments he has exercised in his past in choosing to associate and surround himself with the most radical elements within our society, clearly disqualify him from being qualified to be the president of the United States of America and only the most naive, misinformed, or far left members of our electorate are considering him for their vote. Unfortunately, there are far too many of such persons among our electorate, and we are at the precipice of them finding out the dark consequences to America for their ignorance.




Posted by Richard at October 10, 2008 10:37 AM


Articles Related to Political News and commentaries:

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

;