« How Could A Junior Senator "Nobody" Beat The Clinton Political Machine "Juggernaut"? There Is A Sinister Lesson To Be Learned Here. | Main | The Church of England: 'Government Favors Islam' »

June 7, 2008

Does Barack Hussein Obama Have Any Cojones?

(The "pair" in the image on the right don't belong to Barack "Hussein-the weeny" Obama - they belong to Hillary.)

Joan Swirsky's title is a bit more sophisticated, but it means the same thing and it helps make her point which, along the way, nails Obama for what he is - a Marxist weeny: "Where Is Obama's Testicular Fortitude?" ...

[...] I wish that Obama - with his natural-born gifts of intelligence, soaring oratory, and political passion - were a conservative. We conservatives would cherish such a gifted politician.

But, alas, he remains a hard-core Marxist who only recently - and solely for calculated political reasons - distanced himself from fellow radicals and Chicago "machine" operatives Rev. Jeremiah Wright, domestic terrorist William Ayers, Rev. Michael Pfleger, convicted fixer Tony Rezko and the Windy City's favorite extortionist, Jesse Jackson.

Considering the company Obama keeps, and the hardball they play, it was totally unexpected that his moment in the delegate sun would be eclipsed by - himself!

What was conspicuously missing from Obama's victory speech was his testicular fortitude - or, as they say in New York, cujones (edit - cojones?). Ironically, but accurately, this is a quality that only five weeks ago was attributed to none other than Hillary herself by the president of the Sheet Metal Workers' union in Indiana, Paul Gibson. (edit - of course, everyone knows Hillary has a pair)

Instead of standing on his golden podium and announcing that he and his excellent team of advisors had already chosen his running mate - and then introducing his VP choice - he allowed his opponent to steal the spotlight and grab the headlines.

In stark contrast, Hillary's aggressive rejection of Obama's electoral-delegate victory had all the earmarks of Clinton Cujones on parade! Just as in 2000, Democrats like Hillary prefer to ignore the fact that in our system of government, it is electoral - and not popular - votes that matter!

Upon learning that she had lost the nomination, Hillary chose not to speak about her willingness to support the nominee and move forward on his behalf, but instead launched into one of her boilerplate campaign speeches, reminding America of all her socialist hopes for our country, and repeating, ad nauseum, that she had won the popular vote.

She ended her remarkably ungracious speech by telling the audience that she was taking the next few days to "think about" what she had to do to go forward.

What does that mean? To me, it means that Hillary fully intends to go all the way to the Democrat convention in Denver, Colorado, and to use the Clintons' legendary "scorched earth" strategy to bury Obama. Never mind the buzz that she will "suspend" her campaign on Friday. To "suspend" it is not to end it! The very word reeks of Clinton manipulation and suggests that she's using it to buy time in order to sharpen her machete.

The idea that Hillary become Obama's VP - ostensibly because he couldn't possibly win in November without her "women's" vote - has dominated the airwaves, with Clinton flak Lanny Davis even launching an online petition to drum up support.

But as even the politically disinterested know, if Obama made this choice, he would need a full-time food-taster! (edit - I'd suggest more than one)

As for the short answer to the title's question, given the number of times he's changed his foreign policy positions when challenged by McCain and others, he neither has the courage of his convictions nor any balls. Not exactly what we want in a president. There's virtually nothing I agree with Hillary about, but at least she has a pair - and they're brass.

Recommended: Ding Dong, The Witch Is Dead

Posted by Richard at June 7, 2008 11:23 AM

• Does Barack Hussein Obama Have Any Cojones? - Jun 07, 2008