« On Jihad And Euphemism: Calling Radical Islam By It's Name... | Main | Yet Even More Obama Positions On Iran »
May 21, 2008
Is $12-15-a-Gallon Gas 'Inevitable' ?
Topics: OilAccording to Robert Hirsch, Management Information Services Senior Energy Advisor, in "the mother of all doom and gloom gas price predictions," $12 for a gallon of gas is "inevitable" and it could rise to $15 per gallon. And that may not be the worst of it; Hirsch predicts we could see rationing:
"[T]he prices that we're paying at the pump today are, I think, going to be 'the good old days,' because others who watch this very closely forecast that we're going to be hitting $12 and $15 per gallon," Hirsch said. "And then, after that, when oil - world oil production goes into decline, we're going to talk about rationing. In other words, not only are we going to be paying high prices and have considerable economic problems, but in addition to that, we're not going to be able to get the fuel when we want it."More here (with video) ...
However, the doom and gloom scenario could be just media hype playing the game of "if it bleeds it leads and if it doesn't bleed pretend it does," at least according to analyst John Kilduff:
Kilduff, who is also a CNBC contributor and the vice president of risk management for MF Global (NYSE:MF), isn't predicting oil prices at those levels.So, what are gas prices actually going to? Who knows at this point with prices increasing almost daily. We can only hope the gloom and doom scenario is media hype, and that Kilduff's predictions are more on target than Hirsch's. One thing is certain though: should the Democrats and RINOs in Congress push through cap-and-trade legislation which could face a vote in early June, we'll see gas prices move rapidly toward Hirsch's predictions."I'm not going to $200; I'm not even go to $150, but I think somewhere in the $130s should be the top of this whole run," Kilduff said on CNBC's May 6 "Kudlow & Company," contradicting what Costello reported.
A Lehman Brothers (NYSE:LEH) forecast that received very little media attention predicted oil would drop to $70 a barrel, according to "Kudlow & Company" host Larry Kudlow..
"The Call" host Melissa Francis gave Kilduff an opportunity to clarify his position. She asked Kilduff what was more likely - $200-barrel oil in two years or $75-barrel oil in four years. He said he thought oil at $200 a barrel within two years was "less likely" than oil falling to $75 a barrel within four years. He explained why oil would peak at his target price of $138, then fall.
"If equities can really come back into favor, a lot of this speculative money will come out of the market," Kilduff said on the May 7 "The Call." "And I think one of the key things as well is what happens to China after the Olympics - do they really ratchet down on the growth they've gone through and do they raise prices at the pump? You know China's demand is up 5 percent quarter-on-quarter, year-on-year because they subsidize so much of the price. If they raise their price - that would be a demand killer."
Posted by Abdul at May 21, 2008 9:38 PM
Articles Related to Oil:
- Dems 'Heart' High Gas Prices (Updated) - May 23, 2008
- Double Your Gas Mileage By 'Hypermiling' - May 20, 2008
- The Democrat's Energy Plan Took Us From $57 To $126 A Barrel - May 15, 2008
- OPEC: 'There is Clearly No Shortage of Oil in the Market' - May 08, 2008
- Brazil Oil Discoveries Could End Reliance on Middle East, Zeihan Says - Apr 24, 2008
- Oil Supply Up, Relative Demand Down, Price Is Soaring - I'm Confused - Mar 12, 2008
Comments
Dear Abdul:
Concerning your article, many economic theorists hold that the combined efforts of China and India will exceed the production of the USA by the year 2050. Much of that theory focuses on raw materials, such as the cost of Oil ... predicted to reach $200 per barrel by 2010. Also, the fact that American workers are paid much more for their labor than those of China & India enables these countries to acquire and sustain a competitive advantage.
The current status of the USA ... specially that espoused by Barry Obama ... sustains the focus upon maintaining, if not surpassing, our current degree of affluence. One has to ask how that can be attained given the increased gains in affluence of China & India. Do we cease trading with them and ultimately slow our economic engines of growth?
One solution is to acquire cheap raw materials ... such as oil. With the environmentalists hindering our every move toward self-sufficiency in oil, the task seems insurmountable ... leaving us doomed to be overcome by China & India in the coming decades.
Enter a prima facie humorous antidote:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2018740/posts
The US House Representatives sues OPEC by solid override margin: 324-84.
Of course, lawsuits like this have been tossed around the Manhattan courts for decades over terrorist activities to no avail. Favorable decisions become meaningless.
Yet, if the US Congress were to obtain such a favorable decision with a substantial award for damages ... and you know that they will. Enforcement enters a new arena never before experienced by the Manhattan courts. The USA could enforce the judgment! And, I am not simply referring to seizure of financial assets in the US banks ... we could seize capital assets! We have armies, literally, of enforcers right next door!
Should we materialize this scenario?
I suspect that we will!
With Aloha,
Posted by: harry at May 22, 2008 12:20 AM
Dear Abdul:
As an add-on:
http://www.military.com/news/article/do-you-feel-a-draft.html
Do You Feel a Draft?
May 21, 2008
Military.com|by Colin Clark
In an exchange sure to send ripples of anxiety through the all-volunteer military, the Senate's senior defense spending member asked Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen if it is time to "consider reinstituting the draft."
Sen. Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii), chairman of the Senate Appropriations defense subcommittee, asked Gates and Mullen the question he said no one wants to ask: "Is the cost of maintaining an all-volunteer force becoming unsustainable and, secondly, do we need to consider reinstituting the draft."
Inouye cited the ever-increasing pay and benefits paid to active and reserve service members, noting that it now costs an estimated $126,000 per service member.
Comment: Perhaps, this draft article probes for responses!
With Aloha,
Harry
Posted by: harry at May 22, 2008 10:48 AM
;


















