« Are You Telling Me St. Barrack Obama Isn't Perfect ? | Main | Gay Unions OKay In New Jersey »
December 14, 2006
Pacifist San Francisco Turns "Anti-Pacifier"
Topics: Culture and SocietyJust when you thought you'd seen it all - the most bizarre and outrageous - coming from anti-military, anti-war, anti-gun, anti-establishment, anti-religion, anti-family values, anti-everything but "gay" San Francisco; our lovely "Sodom and Gomorrah on the Bay" (San Francisco and Oakland) has just passed a law banning the sale of baby pacifiers, concerned that chemicals in the plastic of the pacifiers may be harmful to children. Ironically, however, you will still be able to buy miniature dildos made of the same plastic for your child to suck on.
As local business owners and representatives of the American chemicals industry have already filed suits challenging the new law, a new city task force has already been assembled to strictly and forcefully enforce the new city ordinance as soon as it goes into effect, without exception.
Store owners will still be able to have erotic homosexual window displays, and hire illegal aliens, but if they are found selling any illegal pacifiers, they will be heavily fined and the offending pacifiers confiscated from their shelves.
On a related subject, there is outrage in San Francisco, from civil leaders, the press, and many in the population, about Bill O'Reilly having had the audacity to question in his program recently whether there were any adverse psychological effects to a child from being raised by lesbian or homosexual couples, versus having the traditional father and a mother.
On last night's Factor Bill touched again on the subject, amazed that his having simply raised the question would have elicited such an outcry from secularists all over.
To discuss the subject Bill had as guests two women who are advocates of parenting by gays and lesbians.
Bill asked one of them, lesbian journalist, and author of her autobiographical book titled "A Self-made Man", Norah Vincent, if it was valid to ask, not for religious or moral considerations, but simply from a scientific point of view, whether the optimum was for a child to have a father and a mother instead of two mommies or two daddies, since obviously nature, evolution, and natural selection had favored this arrangement, and whether then being raised by a homosexual or lesbian couple would not affect the child adversely.
To this Ms. Vincent (or is it Mr. Vincent - the "self-made man"?) responded by arguing that what Bill was referring to was "reproduction" whereas parenting was "cultural." Of course, Ms. Vincent sees nothing wrong with the child carrying for the rest of his or her life the trauma of the psychological and emotional baggage of likely growing up with a confused sexual identity, the inner conflict of being raised as a homosexual though born heterosexual, and of lacking the proper role models nature intended for his or her proper development and the acquisition of gender-specific social interaction skills!
When at the end of the segment, Bill took leave of his guests by saying: "Thank you ladies", it was amusing to see Ms. Vincent, the "self-made man," wince at the appellation! Priceless! Ha, ha!
Posted by Althor at December 14, 2006 1:38 PM
Articles Related to Culture and Society:
- Pacifist San Francisco Turns "Anti-Pacifier" - Dec 14, 2006
