« Liberal Gays Against Al Gore And Lesbian Seagulls | Main | When Our Enemy's Propaganda Matches The Talking Points Of The Democratic Party ... »
November 6, 2006
Is The Press At War With America?
Topics: War on TerrorJames Q. Wilson notes at WSJ.com's Opinion Journal that despite the results from "careful polsters" that half of the American people believe that our troops should be brought home from Iraq immediately, he's actually encouraged - given the press coverage of our efforts in Iraq, he's surprised that 90% of the public don't want us out right now. I'm inclined to not only agree with him but add that, if anything, he's understating the media's apparent hatred and almost traitorous (in terms of supporting the enemy) toward our country:
Suppose the current media posture about American military and security activities had been in effect during World War II. It is easy to imagine that happening. In the 1930s, after all, the well-connected America First Committee had been arguing for years about the need for America to stay out of "Europe's wars." Aware of these popular views, the House extended the draft by only a one-vote margin in 1941. Women dressed in black crowded the entrance to the Senate, arguing against extending the draft. Several hundred students at Harvard and Yale, including future Yale leader Kingman Brewster and future American president Gerald Ford, signed statements saying that they would never go to war. Everything was in place for a media attack on the Second World War. Here is how it might have sounded if today's customs were in effect:December 1941. Though the press supports America's going to war against Japan after Pearl Harbor, several editorials want to know why we didn't prevent the attack by selling Japan more oil. Others criticize us for going to war with two nations that had never attacked us, Germany and Italy.
October 1942. The New York Times runs an exclusive story about the British effort to decipher German messages at a hidden site at Bletchley Park in England. One op-ed writer criticizes this move, quoting Henry Stimson's statement that gentlemen do not read one another's mail. Because the Bletchley Park code-cracking helped us find German submarines before they attacked, successful U-boat attacks increased once the Germans, knowing of the program, changed their code.
January 1943. After President Roosevelt and Prime Minister Churchill call for the unconditional surrender of the Axis powers, several newspapers criticize them for having closed the door to a negotiated settlement. The press quotes several senators complaining that the unconditional surrender policy would harm the peace process.
May 1943. A big-city newspaper reveals the existence of the Manhattan Project and its effort to build atomic weapons. In these stories, several distinguished scientists lament the creation of such a terrible weapon. After Gen. Leslie Groves testifies before a congressional committee, the press lambastes him for wasting money, ignoring scientific opinion, and imperiling the environment by building plants at Hanford and Oak Ridge.
December 1944. The German counterattack against the Allies in the Ardennes yields heavy American losses in the Battle of the Bulge. The press gives splashy coverage to the Democratic National Committee chairman's assertion that the war cannot be won. A member of the House, a former Marine, urges that our troops be sent to Okinawa.
August 1945. After President Truman authorizes dropping the atomic bomb on Japan, many newspapers urge his impeachment.Read Wilson's entire argument here.... Journalism, like so much scholarship, now dwells in a postmodern age in which truth is hard to find and statements merely serve someone's interests.
The mainstream media's adversarial stance, both here and abroad, means that whenever a foreign enemy challenges us, he will know that his objective will be to win the battle not on some faraway bit of land but among the people who determine what we read and watch. We won the Second World War in Europe and Japan, but we lost in Vietnam and are in danger of losing in Iraq and Lebanon in the newspapers, magazines and television programs we enjoy.
As Wilson points out in his piece, it's a damned good thing that the press didn't cover World War II the way it covered Vietnam and has covered Iraq (my phrasing, not his), else we wouldn't be America now. Taking the idea one step further, if the press doesn't stop it's support of the enemy in the War on Terror, America won't be here at the end of the war. Like he says, "The mainstream media's adversarial stance, both here and abroad, means that whenever a foreign enemy challenges us, he will know that his objective will be to win the battle not on some faraway bit of land but among the people who determine what we read and watch." For now, the radical Islamists have both the media and the Democratic party to thank for the current lack of collective will among our the American people - to win the War on Terror.
Posted by Richard at November 6, 2006 2:33 PM
Articles Related to War on Terror:
- Is The Press At War With America? - Nov 06, 2006
