« About Kerry and the Half Wit New York Times | Main | NYT: Saddam Was One Year Away From Having An Atomic Bomb »

November 3, 2006

CNN 'Sniper Fire'

Topics: Political News and commentaries

Sane (Society of Americans for National Existence) isn't sure which scrapes the bottom of the barrel more efficiently: the New York Times or CNN.

[...] The truth be told, the New York Times has published every secret national security program they could get their dirty hands on and have written every salacious article possible about supposed abuses by US soldiers and interrogators and put them on page one with full color photos.

No problem publishing the Abu Ghraib pictures to inflame the infamous Arab Street against our soldiers on the ground to make it more dangerous for them and more difficult for America to win this war but you can bet the Times would never publish the Muslim mocking cartoons. Why is that you ask, naively? Because no US government official and no US soldier had a hand in drawing the cartoons. If the Times published them, the Times itself would be targeted. Can't have happy hour at the Times disturbed by marauding Muslims from that "peaceful and nobel" religion.

CNN of course has a long history. From its pro-Palestinian bias to its anti-American everything. It amazes us that any red blooded American would patronize either CNN or the Times.

Does your pension or your indexed portfolio own any Turner Broadcasting or NYT stock? Dump it.

Posted by Abdul at November 3, 2006 10:14 AM

Articles Related to Political News and commentaries:

• CNN 'Sniper Fire' - Nov 03, 2006