« Arizona's Janet Napolitano Supports Driver's Licenses for Illegals | Main | 'The Only Good Sniper...' »
October 25, 2006
On The Insanity Of What The "Blame America" Crowd Believes: An Appropriate Reply!
Topics: Political News and commentariesIn a recent exchange at Patterico, I received a comment by one of our beloved "blame America" Democrat compatriots, which I believe is so eloquently indicative of the Left's and the Democrat's asinine, insane, positions, that I strongly feel I should share it with you all, especially as it pertains to these upcoming elections.
The exchange began when one of the commenters, who goes by the name of Leviticus, replied to some comment I had earlier made regarding Bush's admission that tactics have had to often been changed in Iraq to adapt to new circumstances, which in itself is a defacto admission by President Bush that indeed, as with every war, and as with every complex situation, mistakes have been made in Iraq, which disproves the much touted Democratic, leftists talking point mantra that President Bush has never owned to any of his mistakes in conducting the war in Iraq! Leviticus, wrote:
"If [Bush] ever admitted any mistakes and did his job well in the first place, this could be said of him...yet it hasn't. There is no Justice, is there Althor?""What Althor reads:
"I 'luv' Bill Clinton - he's so great i want to give him a great big hug - he's so much better than Bush - Bush is a meany - I hate him LOL""Focus, moron. Saying that 'we are constantly adapting our strategy to address such challenges more effectively' is NOT the same as saying "I made a mistake by going into Iraq. I'm sorry.""
Think of it this way: You break into your neighbor's house because you want to steal his valuables. He catches you at gunpoint. However, out of the mercy of his heart, he says that he will let you go if you apologize. Now, are you going to say 'I am constantly adapting my strategy to break into your house in a more efficient, less noisy manner'?"
"I doubt it. I doubt even more that anyone would qualify such a statement as an apology."
So in response to Leviticus' comments I replied the following, incensed by such an inappropriate, insane, and utterly nonsensical analogy:
Let me respond in kind, and see who the real "moron" is, Leviticus!In the first place, I did not "read" into your senseless diatribe anything more nor less than the habitual "I hate Bush," "I hate the Administration," "I hate Republicans," "I hate America," "I hate everything," liberal, leftist, Democratic, "mantra" of talking points mindless dribble we hear day in and day out from irrational "haters" of your ilk! Besides, as much as you may mock, and deny it, I'm sure I wasn't far off the mark, since in your heart of hearts, I am sure that on any given day there would be far more "grace" in your heart for Clinton, than there ever possibly could be for Bush! So, yes, why don't you admit that were you to meet with the bastard, you'd tell him how much you love him and give him a great big hug (though if I were you, I wouldn't shake his hand...lest you accidentally may get some semen on your hand!).
On the second place, the premises upon which you base you whole fallacious arguments is so demonstrably false that it is appalling! Using such an insane analogy as that "we broke into our neighbor's house (Iraq) because we wanted to steal their valuables, that they caught us at gunpoint, and that out of the Radical Islamic mercy of their hearts, they will let us go if we apologize" is simply, absolutely deranged!!! How patently insane is that?
Only in jest, or if someone is "pathologically schizophrenic" (as more and more leftists and Democrats increasingly prove to be) and deluded, would anyone ever make such an insane, absurd, analogy.
Imagine that! Iraq has only got "oil" and "sand," so obviously, since we did not go in there to "steal the oil," as amply proven by rising oil prices and worldwide shortages we would have otherwise supplied with our "ill gotten booty," then it follows, according to your deranged mind, that we must have "broken into Iraq" to steal what?!?! The "sand" ? I am sorry but the extrapolations, though pathetic, are simply hilarious.
And , oh, wait! The Iraqis caught us red-handed and "they" are the ones with the "gun" and in their "Jihadist Islamist mercy" would let us come back home with our tail between our legs to live here "happily ever after" and not bother us ever any more, if we but only had the decency to "apologize"? As if they would not rather nuke us at the drop of a pin, and or behead us all if they could.
I really seriously have to ask you, have you had your "pills" for your "Bush Election 2000 Post-traumatic Syndrome," yet today? After all, so many Democrats suffered from the "malady" right after the elections, that they had to go and see their "Shrinks" about it! I suspect you may be one of them.
We had to go into Iraq because we had no choice! Saddam was a destabilizing force in the region. He, and not us, is the one who "broke into his neighbor's house" twice, when he invaded Iran and when he marched into Kwait! His rogue regime openly supported terrorism and harbored terrorists, as when he offered rewards to the families of suicide bombers in order to entice them to carry out their unspeakable murderous acts of self-immolation; or as when he offered "sanctuary" to countless known, fleeing, terrorists such as Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, who fled to Iraq after the American invasion of Afghanistan! Saddam developed and stockpiled "Weapons of Mass Destruction" that he not only used on his Iranian neighbors, but on his own civilian population as well; and the consensus of the entire Intelligence Community of our allies, as well as our own, just before we went into Iraq, was that he was again stockpiling them in defiance of all the U.N. "sanctions" and "resolutions," and that they indeed posed a "real and present danger" to the U.S. and to the World Community, if he chose to facilitate Al Qaeda and or other terrorist groups around the world with such biological and chemical weapons; regardless of how inaccurate those intelligence estimates may have turned out to be, and or how much you want to carp that "Bush lied to the American people" in your deranged partisan hatred! Saddam, and his two thug sons and brothers, carried out the systematic "ethnic cleansing" of the Kurds in the north of Iraq, as well as that of many other minorities throughout Iraq; he decimated the "Marsh Arabs" of the Delta, and kept the Shi'ite population under an onerous yoke of tyranny and oppression; killing and torturing countless hundreds of thousands of those he perceived as a "threat" - many of them women and children! He kicked out the U.N. Weapons Inspectors, continuously defied the U.N., wiped his ass with all the U.N. resolutions, and thumbed his nose at the U.N. sanctions - thanks to his "pals" of the infamous "Oil for Food" scandal! And what do you and your liberal, anti-war, Democratic buddies on the left propose, even in 20/20 hindsight, we were supposed to do? Send in Jimmy Carter and Madeleine Albright to engage in more "bi-lateral" talks and more "shuttle diplomacy" and given Saddam an "autographed basketball" as we did with Kim Jong-il and North Korea in 1994? As proven by recent events, fine course of action that turned out to be.
But, of course, perhaps we should have done nothing at all, and just waited until Saddam in fact would have provided Al Qaeda and or other terrorist groups with such WMDs and they would have used it upon an American city before we should have done anything about it! After all, don't anti-war peaceniks, leftys and Democrats claim that there is no such thing as a "War on Terror" and that "terrorism" is a "law enforcement" issue, not a "military" one; which naturally means that you have to wait until the "crime" is committed, and hundreds of thousands of American lie dead and or dying of "anthrax" or "nerve gas" in one of our major cities, before they would have done anything about Saddam?!?! That's a great "Democratic Game-plan"! Let's face it, aside, of course, from the position taken by anti-war peaceniks who would not go to war even if foreign troops were one day marching down Pennsylvania Avenue, there was no point to engaging in more "shuttle diplomacy," and Saddam got what he rightly deserved: The "shuttle" forcibly driven up his butt!!!The war in Iraq is being fought at two levels, one militarily, and the other in the court of public opinion. Militarily, our campaign in Iraq has been a resounding success! But the court of public opinion is being manipulated and swayed by the far-left, liberals, and Democrats, and their allies in the "Elite" media, sadly, mostly motivated by sheer, base, political objectives; and they are all hell-bent that we lose it, to serve their political aims and twisted ideological agendas.
The life of each and every one of our servicemen is unique and precious, and everyone from the President, to those at the Pentagon, down to every single American or human being of conscience with half an ounce of decency, is truly sorrowed by each loss and concerned about the mounting death toll; but militarily speaking, the casualties in this conflict, so far, have been negligible, when compared to the losses we've suffered in other wars! And after all, this is "war"!
In Viet Nam, where we "cut-and -run" as many want us to once again do, we lost over 50,000 troops, and as a result of our disgraceful withdrawal, the North Vietnamese, not only took over South Viet Nam and our Vietnamese allies we abandoned, but invaded neighboring Laos and Cambodia, and unleashed the Pol Pot "Killing Fields" of the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia. Today, the mounds of bleaching skulls of the millions of innocent victims who were indiscriminately mass slaughtered sit, a stark, silent, testimony, to the consequential horrors that our cowardly action of "Mc Govern," cut-and-running, withdrawal in Viet Nam set in motion.
Withe the noted exception of the Gulf War, we have lost far more lives in every other conflict in our history, than in the Iraq War; from the Korean War, to WWII, where we lost 500,000 men, to the Civil War, where some experts claim the toll reached an incredible 700,000. And one is forced to ask oneself, if during those crucial times in our nation's history, indeed the world's, particularly during WWII and the Civil War, we would have chosen the same path of withdrawal and defeatism we chose in Viet Nam, and that the "Left" and the "Democrats" wish us so vehemently to take yet again today in Iraq, if there would even be an America today... while most likely we would all be eating "Kraut" now, and hailing "Sieg Heil" in a sea of raised arms and "odorous" armpits.
We would be faring far, far, better in Iraq, if from the very onset of this conflict we would not have been continuously bombarded with the daily barrage of liberal, "peacenik," anti-war, leftists, doom-saying, Democratic, "got-cha," negative, "propaganda" spewing from Washington Democrats and their allies in the "Elite" media, which has only served to embolden, and traitorously give "aid and comfort," to our Islamist enemies, which has persistently tried to ignominiously demoralize and slander our troops with its daily dose of venom, and which ultimate goal is to seek our defeat in Iraq - in order to humiliate President Bush, discredit his policies and his Administration, and usher the "defeatist," "cut-and-run" Democrats back into political power.
This, unbelievably so, is a common goal shared by the "terrorist insurgents" in Iraq, and the "Left" and the "Democrats" in this country, and which both are hell-bent in achieving with these coming November elections, as witnessed by the surge in all the bloodshed and the violence in Iraq put up by the insurgents just two weeks before the "fateful" elections for all those precious "made for TV," "picture moments," relentlessly being drummed about, by the biased, "Democratic allied" liberal, "Elite" media, which has been screaming the Democrat's and the insurgent's "propaganda" mantra at the top of its "pink" lungs from every one of its newspaper headlines, and assiduously showing the horrific, often "staged," disturbing images of all the carnage 24 /7 on our television screens, with the intent of negatively swaying American public opinion and influencing the elections in favor of the Democrats on election day.
As a footnote, ironically, CNN has just been "outed" in the last couple of days, as having "significant" ties with the radical Islamist terrorist and the insurgents in Iraq, allowing them to set the tone of the coverage and to "stage" much of the footage showing all the "devastation" and the "carnage" we see daily on our television screens, to proselytize their hateful "ideology" during coverage, and to spew all their "anti-American" (feelings most of those at CNN as well as the terrorists both share) "propaganda," in exchange for " exclusive access" - much as that "unofficial" mouthpiece of AlQaeda, Al Jazeera, habitually does! Some conservative lawmakers in Washington are so enraged by this treasonous behavior on the part of CNN, that they have requested the Pentagon to rescind all CNN reporters, and bar them from being embedded with U.S. troops.
But what is even more ironic, is that given the "overt" concern shown recently by "hand-wringing," liberal, leftist, Democrats, over the "Geneva Convention rights" of captured Jihadist murderous thugs in street clothes, and over the use of "coercive interrogation" methods on them, in Washington- remember, to these concerned "bleeding heart" Democrats, the detainees should only receive "Goldilocks and the Three Bears" treatment during their internment as pertains to their food, accommodations, and creature comforts: Food that is "Halal," served "not too cold, not too hot, but just right", rooms that are "not too cold, not too hot, but just right", and beds that are "not too hard, not too soft, but just right", all of which, of course, Nancy Pelosi "Goldilocks" and the Democrats heartily approve - yet these same "bleeding heart" liberals, leftists, and Democrats, apparently turn a blind eye, and give a rat's ass about the countless victims which Saddam, heinously, systematically, raped, tortured, and massacred, whose countless bodies, numbering in the hundreds of thousands - many of which were women and children - keep turning up in mass graves all over throughout Iraq, and from which horrors our troops delivered the Iraqi people.
But of course, according to these same liberals, leftists, and Democrats we had no business "liberating" the Iraqi people in the first place.
Apparently these gray-haired, balding, leftist, Democrat "Baby Boomers," former "Hippies" now in "Armani suits" and "silk ties" and their liberal, amoral, "secular progressive" "brood," which are the "pampered" result of the Post-war - the greatest period of plenty and prosperity for the common man in the history of America - are irritated! In their self-centered, "Rebel without a cause," "Viet Cong Flag wielding," pot smoking, "free love," isolationism, they feel that by our going into Iraq we "disturbed" the "Status Quo" in the region, and that now we have this "pesky" war to "divert" their attention from more important "pursuits" such as watching who won on "American Idol," or participating in their politically correct "Gay Pride Parades"! One has just to see the patronizing contempt with which the likes of Bill Mahrer, who is arguably the epitome of the aforementioned, has all along referred to, not only to the people in Iraq, but to those every day Americans dwelling in between those two thin "Blue" fringes on either side of the continent, to realize the amount of "hubris" and "conceit" that makes up their "Latte drinking," "Sushi eating," twisted, leftists, Democratic, "Elitist" ideology... and then the cynics wish to pass themselves off as the "Party of the People". Yeah, right!
In sooth, Leviticus, nothing better describes you and your sick, "affectated," peacenik, leftists, Democratic ilk, than the words once uttered by Gertrude Stein about a previous generation! That generation also embraced the proven failed policies and ideology of "pacifism" and "appeasement," to the point of lowering their heads like eunuchs, and accepting the yoke of Nazism and German occupation throughout Europe in 1938, much as the "defeatist," "cut-and-run," Democrats of today wish us to do in the face of the impending threat of Islamofacism, and in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Stein's hauntingly descriptive remark about that generation, eerily fits today leftist, liberal, secular progressive, defeatist, "cut-and-run," "Viet Cong flag wielding," "Baby Boom" Democrats perfectly: "You are all a lost generation!"
Let us only hope that America, as we know it, will be able endure long enough, until this accursed "lost generation" are all finally in their graves.
Posted by Althor at October 25, 2006 4:27 AM
Articles Related to Political News and commentaries:
















