Latest Entry: Louisiana Purchased by Reid     Latest Comments: Talk Back Here

« New Blood Test Detects Lung Cancer | Main | Iraqi Tribes unite to drive Al Qaeda out of Anbar Province »

October 3, 2006

Foley And The Democratic Playbook

Topics: Political News and commentaries

So, just what are the myopic Dems up to now, given that they have little to offer in the way of policitical discourse, nothing to contribute to solving the nation's problems, and nothing to even offer up for discussion - other than whatever current scandel they can drum up against the Republicans (albeit, often with help from the Republicans themselves)? After all, they are weak on national security, strong on amnesty for illegal immigrants, and are cut and run on defense.

The Hotline seems to have the hot scoop on the answer, and believes that this is the Dems' playbook:

1. Pay no heed to the distinction between the e-mails and IMs.

2. Enlarge the wedge between House leaders.

3. Be aggressive about how Dems will -- and are -- protecting children.

4. Choose unimpeachable spokespeople to be their public face.

5. Deride the Republicans for incompetence.

6. Bring up Terri Schiavo's case

7. Compare what the GOP leadership says about Foley with what Republicans said about Jack Abramoff.

8. Use the Foley cash.

Here's what the Democrats hope to accomplish:

1. Republicans will flinch before they try and use "values" as a cudgel.

2. Democrats now have a new way to respond to the Republicans when they go negative: "They're just trying to distract you from the scandal."

3. GOP candidates will be thrown on the defensive, generally.

4. Link House candidates -- and not just Reynolds -- to the sense that that the GOP was hesitant to investigate or even poke around into Foley's life because they didn't want to jeopardize their majority.

More on the details here.

Sounds like a typical Democratic game plan - have their candidates in each and every House and Senate race focus on a scandal du jour, in hopes they can fill their deep sucking vacuum of non-existant solutions on terrorism, national security, immigration, and Iran, and hope a majority of the American public is dumb enough to fall for their left-of-enter, multicultural, "blame it on America," liberal political agenda that hands Western civilization and culture over to the Islamists on a silver plate.

Think people, Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House? Harry Reid as Senate leader?

With a Democratic majority, 11 of the 20 House committees would be chaired by members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus or Congressional Black Caucus. In addition, 45 of 92 House subcommittee chairs would be members of the Progressive, Black, Hispanic or Asian Pacific Caucus.

Think about saying goodbye to America and hello to sharia law. Do you honestly believe that the Congressional Progressive Caucus or Congressional Black Caucus is the right choice to support strong national defense and national security, and help lead us to victory over the Islamic terrorists and Iran that want to kill us?

Related "positive news": Voters unmoved by ethics issues

Posted by Richard at October 3, 2006 12:20 AM



Articles Related to Political News and commentaries: