So just what is it that the Dems want to do about Iraq other than simply cut and run? What policies have they put forth as an alternate solution to the current policy of continuing to adjust to the changing conditions on the ground, while working on a multitude of areas to help the Iraqi people stand up for themselves and form a stable government? What do the Dems want to change our policy in Iraq to? We've heard cut and run, or re-deployment; is that their answer to winning the war in Iraq and the War on Terror?

Cutting and running, or "re-deploying" as the Dems would have it, is showing our tails to the enemy - and it most surely will come back to haunt us in our own streets; for surely, the enemy will follow our troops home to our own shores should we allow defeat in Iraq. The Dems need to wake up and realize that they need to join with the President in defeating our enemies rather than continuing to provide propaganda support for the terrorists. By undermining the national will to fight, the Democratic party has in fact made the battle more difficult for America, and has served as a propaganda arm for al-Qaeda in Iraq and the Islamists throughout the world that are determined to kill us.

Perhaps, in hindsight, we should have done some things differently, and indeed should have. But the Democrats apparently have not only failed to grasp the realities of war, but also the consequences to us at home should we fail in Iraq. Again, President George Bush is not the enemy, the insurgents and terrorists in Iraq are - as is the medieval tribal system of Middle Eastern culture. Yet the Dems just can't get over putting their political agenda before national security.

Texas Fred has more commentary.