« Annoyed With The Media | Main | On The MSM's Hizballah Sources For News They Report As Fact »

August 2, 2006

Faux 'moderate' Islamists

Topics: Understanding Islam

Part one in a three-part series, By M. Zuhdi Jasser:

It is almost five years since September 11, one year since the July 7 attacks in Britain and just months after the arrests of alleged members of a Toronto terrorist cell. But the intellectual machinery of the United States has not legitimately engaged the Muslim American community and its leadership in an ideological debate about Islamism.

Stories about Muslims and Islam are now ubiquitous in the mainstream media. Yet rarely is there any substantive discussion with American Muslims about the ideology of Islamism or its prevalence. Is it limited to the activists? Is it the money trail? Or is it the faith? These questions and others that engage American Muslims in declaring or denouncing Islamist ideology seem to generally be off-limits for the media and for our elected officials. As they dance around this central cognitive engagement of our global war, the consequences to our nation's security are immeasurable.

Many frontline reporters seem to actually have little understanding of the conflict between Islamism and Islam. There is a deep contradiction between the Islamist ideology of theocracy and our Americanism. Avoiding this, we forget who we are. The touchstone of Americanism that Islamists fear the most is our constitutional system, which protects our individual spiritual liberty through a complete separation of religion and state.

While the vast majority of Muslims do not support terrorism as a means of political change, the burning question is where Muslim leaders and their constituencies stand regarding the ideology of Islamism. Moreover, is there a difference between Islam and Islamism? If pious Muslims can be anti-Islamist, shouldn't public discourse highlight this potent ideological weapon against the political ends of our enemies?

There are plenty of news and human-interest stories about Muslims and Islam that discuss the so-called "moderate" Muslim American identity. But what is the exact measure of this moderation? The concept of moderation can be superimposed upon any ideological construct. How long is it going to take for conventional wisdom to come to terms with the fact that moderation within Islamism is in no way moderation with regards to Americanism? Until this understanding is commonplace, anti-Islamist American Muslims are going to be unable to force the hand of their fellow Muslims in the ideological conflict within Islam against the Islamist ends.

Continue reading at The Washington Times...

Posted by Richard at August 2, 2006 12:27 PM

Articles Related to Understanding Islam:

• Robert Spencer Addresses ISNA's Attack On McCain For Calling Islamic Terrorism - Islamic Terrorism - May 01, 2008
• Muslim Woman Suing Over Niqab is Lying To Federal Judge - Apr 30, 2008
• Pakistani Senate condemns Motoons, Fitna, urges UN to take 'all necessary legal, political and administrative steps to curb this trend' - Apr 26, 2008
• More Than 'A Little Unhinged' - Apr 26, 2008
• Muslim Groups Complain About McCain Referring To "Islamic terrorists" As "Islamic Terrorists - Apr 21, 2008
• Book ''Why We Left Islam' may face Muslim wrath - Apr 21, 2008
• Arab And Muslim Countries, With Help From The UN, Are Out To Destroy Our Right Of Free Speech - Apr 18, 2008
• Robert Spencer On Freedom Of Speech In The Age Of Jihad - Apr 13, 2008
• Behold the wisdom (despotic logic) of the Saudi cleric, Muhammad al-Munajid - Apr 12, 2008
• Here's The 'New' Fitna (Updated) - Apr 09, 2008