Latest Entry: Louisiana Purchased by Reid     Latest Comments: Talk Back Here

« Fauxphotography - abusing the privacy of the dead | Main | Two Of British Terrorists Were Muslim Converts »

August 11, 2006

Britain Looks To 'Why Us'

Topics: Dhimmitude

Administrative note: Notice that I've categorized this post under dhimmitude.

A Boston.com piece this morning says that Britons are again wondering what they have we done wrong. How could British citizens of Pakistani origin, but nonetheless British, plot to blow up airplanes over the Atlantic, which would be sure to kill hundreds of their fellow citizens? What is it about Muslim youths in Europe that draws them to suicide and religious fanaticism?

When I was researching how European countries interact with the Muslim minorities during a fellowship at the American Academy in Berlin last winter, I found British Muslims to be the envy of their French and German counterparts. Britain allowed more public space for Islam than did Germany or France, more tolerance, more dedication to multiculturalism, more Muslim faces on television, and more participation in the national life. Interviews indicated that British Muslims themselves thought they were better off in Britain than in Germany or France.

Yet when the Pew Foundation polled thousands of Muslims in Europe it found that British Muslims held more negative views about the West than did Muslims on the continent. One startling statistic: 68 percent of British Muslims held negative views of Jews, while only 29 percent of French Muslims held similar views.

One reason for this, according to one of Britain's most senior policeman of South Asian origin, Tarique Ghaffur, may be foreign policy. Britain's engagement in the Iraq war, its high-profile role in Afghanistan, and its close alliance with US foreign policy in the Israeli-Palestinian dispute may be a trigger for alienated youth who perceive Islam as being under siege. They connect Britain's role in the world with their own lack of employment and under-class status.

Doesn't this sound familiar? Foreign policy? Islam under attack? I thought these people were Brits!

Not so. It just happenst that most, not all, Muslims - identify with the ummah rather than their country. They don't like the fact that certain Western governments (i.e. the U.S. and Great Britain) are unwilling to succumb to the ambition of the radical Islamists to conquer the world in the name of Islam, and be "Islamicized." In other words, it's that old bedouin mentality rising to the surface within much of the Muslim community. Unwilling to assimilate like the rest of their country's citizens who have emigrated from foreign lands or have grown up as Brits irregardless of their parents native country, a large and growing percentage of the Muslim youth in the West choose to fall in lockstep with the ideology followed by radical clerics and their fellow misquided peers. A huge percentage of these people actually believe that 9/11 is a CIA/Jewish conspiracy - and that's just a warmup to the ridiculous inflamatory mistruths they learn from their cultural environment.

1.jpg

Yet, typical of the Europeans and the American liberal Left, it's always mea culpa first, reason last if ever.

There's an old expression for people like that - people that fail to recognize the threat and the real cause of the threat until the threat is no longer a threat but a reality. Their called "dead meat" Kaput! Along with their civilization.

As for the cause - it's beCAUSE they hate everyone that doesn't believe what they do, that threatens their sick, perverted, dark age, tribal/bedouin culture and ideology. It's not complicated - it's radical Islam.

It's fish or cut bait time - the Brits and the rest of the West either get it, or it gets us.

Howard Bloom "got it" in his piece, "Islam's War Against the West."

... there are barbarians--people whose cultures glorify the act of murder, and elevate violence to a holy deed. These cultures portray the extinction of other human beings as a validation of manliness, a heroic gesture in the name of truth, or simply a good way to get ahead in the world.

Certain Islamic societies tend to be high on this list. On November 28, 1943, Franklin Roosevelt met secretly with Joseph Stalin and Winston Churchill in Iran. When Roosevelt returned home, he sent a telegram to the Shah thanking the Iranian ruler for his hospitality. The President explained that he'd noticed the hills in Iran were bare. American agronomists had learned to prevent soil erosion and enrich the landscape by planting trees on slopes like these. Roosevelt suggested an experimental tree-planting program.

The Iranian leader thanked FDR. But privately the young potentate was highly insulted: According to Moslem standards, the gift demeaned his virility. Stalin was far more understanding of Mohammedan culture. He offered the Shah tanks and planes.

Hafez al-Assad, father of the current leader of Syria, worked hard to solidify his position as the country's undisputed ruler. He didn't do it by selling Syria's citizens on the values of his political platform. Instead, he slaughtered 20,000 Moslem Fundamentalists who opposed him.

According to The New York Times, in 1980 Yasir Arafat, the Palestinian leader, had a Lebanese imam (a holy man roughly equivalent to a pastor) shot in the head for refusing to preach the propaganda of the PLO. Then Arafat visited the imam's Lebanese home, took his ten-year-old son aside, explained to the little boy that his father had been murdered by the Israelis, handed the lad a gun, and said, "When you grow up, use this to take revenge." Arafat wanted the boy to be a killer.

Holiness, righteousness, and even day-to-day propriety in Islamic cultures are based on the example of Mohammed. Though Islamic literature praises Mohammed as a man of peace, he was also a military leader. In 624 AD, The Prophet announced the concept of the Jihad--the holy war. He said in the blessed book, The Koran, "I will instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them. ...And slay them wherever ye catch them...." In the next nine years, the man of peace ordered a minimum of 27 military campaigns. He personally led nine of them.

It is not surprising that Moslem jurists would later declare that there are two worlds: the world of Islam--Dar al-Islam--and the non-Islamic world--Dar al-Harb. These two territorial spheres, explained the Moslem scholars, are in a state of perpetual war. According to some Koranic interpreters, any leader who fails to "make wide slaughter" in the land of the infidel is committing a sin. A statesman is only allowed the temporary expedient of peace if his forces are not yet strong enough to win.

This may explain why Elias Canetti, in his Nobel Prize-winning book Crowds and Power, calls Islam a killer religion, literally "a Religion of War."

Related: ISLAMIC CENSORSHIP - HOW ALLAH HAS NIPPED YOUR RIGHT TO KNOW

Posted by Richard at August 11, 2006 7:33 AM



Articles Related to Dhimmitude: