« About That Hoekstra Letter - What The NYT Left Out And The WaPo Added | Main | Dead Jews Don't Count »

July 10, 2006

The Solution To The Hamdans, Abu Ghraibs, And Gitmos - Kill Em And Take No Prisoners!

Topics: War on Terror

Ralph Peters says what many have been thinking, and reminds us (is SCOTUS listening?) that the oft-cited, seldom-read Geneva and Hague Conventions define legal combatants as those who visibly identify themselves by wearing uniforms or distinguishing insignia (the latter provision covers honorable partisans - but no badges or armbands, no protection). Those who wear civilian clothes to ambush soldiers or collect intelligence are assassins and spies - beyond the pale of law:

Violent Islamist extremists must be killed on the battlefield. Only in the rarest cases should they be taken prisoner. Few have serious intelligence value. And, once captured, there's no way to dispose of them.

Killing terrorists during a conflict isn't barbaric or immoral - or even illegal. We've imposed rules upon ourselves that have no historical or judicial precedent. We haven't been stymied by others, but by ourselves.

Traditionally, those who masquerade as civilians in order to kill legal combatants have been executed promptly, without trial. Severity, not sloppy leftist pandering, kept warfare within some decent bounds at least part of the time. But we have reached a point at which the rules apply only to us, while our enemies are permitted unrestricted freedom.

The present situation encourages our enemies to behave wantonly, while crippling our attempts to deal with

This isn't an argument for a murderous rampage, but its opposite. We must kill our enemies with discrimination. But we do need to kill them. A corpse is a corpse: The media's rage dissipates with the stench. But an imprisoned terrorist is a strategic liability.

Nor should we ever mistreat captured soldiers or insurgents who adhere to standing conventions. On the contrary, we should enforce policies that encourage our enemies to identify themselves according to the laws of war. Ambiguity works to their advantage, never to ours.

Our policy toward terrorists and insurgents in civilian clothing should be straightforward and public: Surrender before firing a shot or taking hostile action toward our troops, and we'll regard you as a legal prisoner. But once you've pulled a trigger, thrown a grenade or detonated a bomb, you will be killed. On the battlefield and on the spot.

And by the way, as Peters points out, think about how the terroristshave treated the uniformed American soldiers they've captured? According to the Geneva Convention? Not unless beheading is designated by the Geneva Convention as the treatment of choice for uniformed prisoners, and last time I checked, that's definately not the case!

Posted by Richard at July 10, 2006 12:04 PM

Articles Related to War on Terror:

• The Solution To The Hamdans, Abu Ghraibs, And Gitmos - Kill Em And Take No Prisoners! - Jul 10, 2006