Latest Entry: American Pravda and New York's Sixth Crime Family     Latest Comments: Talk Back Here

« On Disastrous Miscalculations | Main | IDF Takes Maroun al-Ras - Captures Hezbollah Regional Commander »

July 25, 2006

Palestinians Want Out Of Border War

Topics: Middle East News and Perspectives

Are the Palestinians really declaring "No Mas"? Apparently so: "All groups in Gaza have now agreed to stop fighting and return Gilad Shalit in exchange for a simple cessation of hostilities and the promise of future releases of prisoners."

As noted at CQ, "If true, and if the Palestinians plan to keep their word and put an end to all Qassam rocket attacks, then this represents a major victory for the Israelis."

But that's a very big "If true"! The Palestinian culture of death and the hatred of Jews runs so deep within the culture, and in the case of the terrorist groups like Hamas, the Fatah movement, and others, it peace with Israel flies in the face of the very core and purpose of their existence.

Could it be that the Palestinians, being more Sunni than Shi'ite, are more afraid of Hezbollah than Israel? It surely isn't that they are willing to recognize Israel and have a lasting peace - it just isn't in their nature, as history clearly has shown.

Meanwhile, all this occurred prior to the event of Condoleezza Rice's visit to the PA. You'll find a transcript of Condoleezza Rice's meeting with Palestinian Authority PM Abbas, here.

In a related perspective, Mark Steyn says that the myth that the Muslim world's problems are directly linked to the Palestinian question has gone up in flames:

A FEW years back, when folks talked airily about "the Middle East peace process" and "a two-state solution", I used to say that the trouble was the Palestinians saw a two-state solution as an interim stage en route to a one-state solution. I underestimated Islamist depravity. As we now see in Gaza and southern Lebanon, any two-state solution would be an interim stage en route to a no-state solution.

In one of the most admirably straightforward of Islamist declarations, Hussein Massawi, the Hezbollah leader behind the slaughter of US and French forces 20 years ago, put it this way: "We are not fighting so that you will offer us something. We are fighting to eliminate you."

Swell. But suppose he got his way, what then? Suppose every last Jew in Israel were dead or fled, what would rise in place of the Zionist entity? It would be something like the Hamas-Hezbollah terror squats in Gaza and Lebanon writ large. Hamas won a landslide in the Palestinian elections, and Hezbollah similarly won formal control of key Lebanese cabinet ministries. But they're not Mussolini: they have no interest in making the trains run on time. And, to be honest, who can blame them?

If you're a big-time terrorist mastermind, it's frankly a bit of a bore to find yourself deputy under-secretary at the ministry of pensions, particularly when you're no good at it, and no matter how lavishly the European Union throws money at you, there never seems to be any in the kitty when it comes to making the payroll. So, like a business that has over-diversified, Hamas and Hezbollah retreated to their core activity: Jew-killing.

In Causeries du Lundi, Charles-Augustin Sainte-Beuve recalls a Parisian dramatist watching the revolutionary mob rampaging through the street below and beaming: "See my pageant passing!" That's how opportunist Arabs and indulgent Europeans looked on the intifada and the terrorists and the schoolgirl suicide bombers: as a kind of uber-authentic piece of performance art with which to torment the Jews and the Americans. They never paused to ask themselves: Hey, what if it doesn't stop there?

Well, about 30 years too late, they're asking it now. For the first quarter-century of Israel's existence, the Arab states fought more or less conventional wars against the Zionists and kept losing. So then they figured it was easier to anoint a terrorist movement and in 1974 declared Yasser Arafat's Palestine Liberation Organisation to be the "sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people", which is quite a claim for an organisation then barely a decade old. Amazingly, the Arab League persuaded the UN, the EU, Bill Clinton and everyone else to go along with it and to treat the old monster as a head of state who lacked only a state to head.

It's true that many nationalist movements have found it convenient to adopt the guise of terrorists.

But, as the Palestinian movement descended from airline hijackings to the intifada to self-detonating in pizza parlours, it never occurred to its glamorous patrons to wonder if maybe this was, in fact, a terrorist movement conveniently adopting the guise of nationalism.

Continue reading here...

Posted by Richard at July 25, 2006 1:19 PM



Articles Related to Middle East News and Perspectives: