Latest Entry: American Pravda and New York's Sixth Crime Family     Latest Comments: Talk Back Here

« Onward To One World Government: What Do You Know About President Bush's 'North American Union'? | Main | Why Does The U.S. Military Continue It's Anti-Christian Agenda? »

June 28, 2006

Are Palestinians Using Iranian Weapons?

Topics: Middle East News and Perspectives

Charles at LGF says that It's been pointed out to him by knowledgeable readers that the explosive devices being planted by Palestinian terrorists, as children stand around watching, resemble the type of shaped anti-tank charges manufactured by the Islamic Republic of Iran:

hamas iran.jpg

Charles provides a drawing of a shaped charge from the Telegraph, which appears to remarkably resemble the Palestinian devices:

Iran device.jpg

LGF has more images, including a revealing photo of Palestinian children serving as human shields for the terrorists.

No surprise here - Iran is the largest state sponsor of terrorism in the world. Also, of no surprise, Israeli security officials have told WorldNetDaily they have information the terrorists who carried out the attack were trained by Iranian Revolutionary Guard units and Hezbollah guerillas.

Related: The Looming Power Struggle with Iran:

"Islamic fundamentalists," he told me, "consider democratic reform to be like toilet paper. You use it once, and then you throw it away." There is no doubt in his mind that the Shiites in Iraq are using democracy in this fashion, simply to gain power, with no intention whatsoever of continuing democratic reform beyond that point.

Mr. X contends that Washington only has two options in the region. And both, he concedes, are unpalatable. To promote democracy is to play into the hands of America's enemies: in Iraq, where the Shiites enjoy an overwhelming majority; among Palestinians in Gaza and on the West Bank, where Hamas -- Sunni Moslems, but considered a terrorist organization by the United States -- recently won power in a free election; in a Lebanon dominated by Hezbollah, also labeled terrorists by Washington; and in Eygpt.

Egypt, Mr. X agrees, is run by an aging and corrupt leadership. But free elections there would simply put the Muslim Brotherhood -- another Islamic fundamentalist party -- in power. His advice is to stick with the corrupt but friendly status quo of President Hosni Mubarak in Egypt, while offering similar, unqualified support to the Saudis.

Mr. X is a man of few illusions. Looking at Iraq today, he speaks wistfully of Saddam Hussein. Acknowledging freely that Saddam was incredibly brutal and outrageously corrupt, he reminds me that the Iraqi dictator was, at least, a wall against the expansion of Iranian power. And there is the main focus of all his worries.

We are, he says, embarking on a major power struggle between Iran and Islamic fundamentalism on the one hand, and Western interests, led by the United States, on the other. The concern that Iran may acquire nuclear weapons, he says, is a red herring. Iran's nukes would be counterbalanced, he says, by those in Israel's arsenal.

Mr. X proposes that the best and perhaps the only way to confront Iran effectively is indirectly, inside Iraq. He is concerned that there is already far too much Iranian influence in Iraq, and insists that only U.S. military force can drive it out.

To do that, he says, you will need more troops in Iraq. More, not fewer. And you will have to announce a clear "no exit" policy. When I suggest to him that neither Democrats nor Republicans are likely to be able to sell that package to the American Congress and the public, he shrugs, as if to say: "I've given you a solution. Whether or not you can implement it is up to you."

Posted by Richard at June 28, 2006 1:43 PM



Articles Related to Middle East News and Perspectives: