Does Ballistics Video Suggests Cheney Is Lying? :: Political News and commentaries

« Clinton in Pakistan: Convict cartoon publishers | Main

February 18, 2006

Does Ballistics Video Suggests Cheney Is Lying?

Taylor Marsh and other Lefties/Moonbats are circulating a lengthy video of alleged ballistics analysis and test shootings which seem to indicate that VP Cheney was actually much closer to Whittington when he fired the now notorious shot. It was convincing enough for me to spend a few hours doing some real analysis of the appropriate factors to support or debunk the claims.

Based on his study, Dan Riehl believes the video to be false, and tells you why...

Marsh and company are in serious need of a more involving day job so they have less time for day dreaming!

Posted by Richard at February 18, 2006 01:54 AM

Articles Related to Political News and commentaries:

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments

No, really, I think these guys are on to something. Rove was the actual trigger man. And Abramoff was funneling money to the gun lobby. It all fits. It is just going to require some brave member of the MSM to get to the facts.

# Posted by mermaid123z at 02/18/2006 08:54 am - reply- forum

Subject: Our Goofy Liberals
Bob Herbert has a column in our local paper entiteld " Mr. Vice President, It's Time to Go."
The article was supplied by the New York Times Service.

Here is a quote: "Cheney is arrogant, defiant and at times blatantly vulgar. He once told Sen. Patrick Leahy to perform a crude act upon himself."

Oh my goodness. What a terrible thing to do.

But wait..........did not President Clinton actually perform the vulgar act on one of his interns?! Not once, twice....how many times?? Yes, he did. By his own admission. Eventually. He also lied to a grand jury which is a criminal act for us serfs. But apparently not for royalty.

Liberals defended Clinton after the revelation of his Monica trysts; howevever, when the current VP has a hunting accident we are reminded that he once used the "F" word in a heated confrontation with a political rival. How significant. I am sure the liberals would say that Clinton was not defiant when he told us he did not have sex with that woman. He was just being principled, trying to protect his family, legacy,...you know, save face. We certainly do not need to smear the Office of the President in a time of peace.

Liberals purposefully refuse to distinguish the difference between their man Clinton and anyone else holding office.

# Posted by Sandstorm at 02/18/2006 01:03 pm - reply- forum

February 18, 2006