« Catholic Priest Killed In Turkey By High School Jihadist Enraged By 'Cartoons' | Main | Do 'Raisins' Not Virgins - Await Suicide Bombers? »
February 7, 2006
Dar al-Islam - Islam's House Of War
Topics: Understanding IslamThe key issue at stake in the battle over the 12 Danish cartoons of the Muslim prophet Muhammad is this: Will the West stand up for its customs and mores, including freedom of speech, or will Muslims impose their way of life on the West? - Daniel Pipes, "Cartoons and Islamic Imperialism."
Here's a repost from Powerline that deserves making sure it's not missed:
The New Criterion has posted the timely essay by David Pryce-Jones that is featured in the new issue: "Muslims: Integration or separation?" The essay opens:
Down the many centuries, Muslims have seen themselves inhabiting the Dar al-Islam, and in this exclusive House of Islam they are to have their way in all matters great and small. Conquest delivered into their hands the unbelievers of many lands, and these were offered terms: death for the recalcitrant, and for the rest either conversion to Islam, or the status of dhimmi, that is to say, they were deprived of the rights of Muslims and subjected to special taxation, inferiority in law courts, restrictions on worship, residence and dress, and other social disadvantages.Pryce-Jones's essay perfectly complements Daniel Pipes's column "Cartoons and Islamic Imperialism" on the cartoon intifada. (via Powerline)Persians, Berbers, and Kurds were among those choosing to convert, so that today they are almost entirely Muslim while still retaining their national and cultural identity. Jews and Christian communities, such as the Chaldeans in Iraq or the Copts in Egypt, became dhimmis. Meanwhile, unbelievers in unconquered countries were said to be living in the Dar al-Harb, the House of War, a phrase indicating that one day they too would be obliged by force of arms to choose between death, conversion, and dhimmitude.
(...) The key issue at stake in the battle over the 12 Danish cartoons of the Muslim prophet Muhammad is this: Will the West stand up for its customs and mores, including freedom of speech, or will Muslims impose their way of life on the West? Ultimately, there is no compromise: Westerners will either retain their civilization, including the right to insult and blaspheme, or not.
(...) More specifically, will Westerners accede to a double standard by which Muslims are free to insult Judaism, Christianity, Hinduism, and Buddhism, while Muhammad, Islam, and Muslims enjoy immunity from insults? Muslims routinely publish cartoons far more offensive than the Danish ones. Are they entitled to dish it out while being insulated from similar indignities?(...) The deeper issue here, however, is not Muslim hypocrisy but Islamic supremacism. The Danish editor who published the cartoons, Flemming Rose, explained that if Muslims insist "that I, as a non-Muslim, should submit to their taboos...they're asking for my submission."
Please read all of "Cartoons and Islamic Imperialism" and "Muslims: Integration or separation?".
Posted by Richard at February 7, 2006 2:57 PM
Articles Related to Understanding Islam:
- Robert Spencer Addresses ISNA's Attack On McCain For Calling Islamic Terrorism - Islamic Terrorism - May 01, 2008
- Muslim Woman Suing Over Niqab is Lying To Federal Judge - Apr 30, 2008
- Pakistani Senate condemns Motoons, Fitna, urges UN to take 'all necessary legal, political and administrative steps to curb this trend' - Apr 26, 2008
- More Than 'A Little Unhinged' - Apr 26, 2008
- Muslim Groups Complain About McCain Referring To "Islamic terrorists" As "Islamic Terrorists - Apr 21, 2008
- Book ''Why We Left Islam' may face Muslim wrath - Apr 21, 2008
- Arab And Muslim Countries, With Help From The UN, Are Out To Destroy Our Right Of Free Speech - Apr 18, 2008
- Robert Spencer On Freedom Of Speech In The Age Of Jihad - Apr 13, 2008
- Behold the wisdom (despotic logic) of the Saudi cleric, Muhammad al-Munajid - Apr 12, 2008
- Here's The 'New' Fitna (Updated) - Apr 09, 2008
