Latest Entry: The GOP's oft-ignored and unheralded role in black history     Latest Comments: Talk Back Here

« Catholic Priest Killed In Turkey By High School Jihadist Enraged By 'Cartoons' | Main | Do 'Raisins' Not Virgins - Await Suicide Bombers? »

February 7, 2006

Dar al-Islam - Islam's House Of War

Topics: Understanding Islam

The key issue at stake in the battle over the 12 Danish cartoons of the Muslim prophet Muhammad is this: Will the West stand up for its customs and mores, including freedom of speech, or will Muslims impose their way of life on the West? - Daniel Pipes, "Cartoons and Islamic Imperialism."

Here's a repost from Powerline that deserves making sure it's not missed:

The New Criterion has posted the timely essay by David Pryce-Jones that is featured in the new issue: "Muslims: Integration or separation?" The essay opens:

Down the many centuries, Muslims have seen themselves inhabiting the Dar al-Islam, and in this exclusive House of Islam they are to have their way in all matters great and small. Conquest delivered into their hands the unbelievers of many lands, and these were offered terms: death for the recalcitrant, and for the rest either conversion to Islam, or the status of dhimmi, that is to say, they were deprived of the rights of Muslims and subjected to special taxation, inferiority in law courts, restrictions on worship, residence and dress, and other social disadvantages.

Persians, Berbers, and Kurds were among those choosing to convert, so that today they are almost entirely Muslim while still retaining their national and cultural identity. Jews and Christian communities, such as the Chaldeans in Iraq or the Copts in Egypt, became dhimmis. Meanwhile, unbelievers in unconquered countries were said to be living in the Dar al-Harb, the House of War, a phrase indicating that one day they too would be obliged by force of arms to choose between death, conversion, and dhimmitude.

Pryce-Jones's essay perfectly complements Daniel Pipes's column "Cartoons and Islamic Imperialism" on the cartoon intifada. (via Powerline)
(...) The key issue at stake in the battle over the 12 Danish cartoons of the Muslim prophet Muhammad is this: Will the West stand up for its customs and mores, including freedom of speech, or will Muslims impose their way of life on the West? Ultimately, there is no compromise: Westerners will either retain their civilization, including the right to insult and blaspheme, or not.

(...) More specifically, will Westerners accede to a double standard by which Muslims are free to insult Judaism, Christianity, Hinduism, and Buddhism, while Muhammad, Islam, and Muslims enjoy immunity from insults? Muslims routinely publish cartoons far more offensive than the Danish ones. Are they entitled to dish it out while being insulated from similar indignities?

(...) The deeper issue here, however, is not Muslim hypocrisy but Islamic supremacism. The Danish editor who published the cartoons, Flemming Rose, explained that if Muslims insist "that I, as a non-Muslim, should submit to their taboos...they're asking for my submission."

Please read all of "Cartoons and Islamic Imperialism" and "Muslims: Integration or separation?".

Posted by Richard at February 7, 2006 2:57 PM



Articles Related to Understanding Islam: