« Green Tea Extract Improves Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia | Main | Living In September 10 America »
December 22, 2005
'Warrantless' searches not unprecedented
Topics: War on TerrorThe Washington Times is reporting today that previous administrations, as well as the court that oversees national security cases, agree with President Bush's position that a president legally may authorize searches without warrants in pursuit of foreign intelligence.
"The Department of Justice believes -- and the case law supports -- that the president has inherent authority to conduct warrantless physical searches for foreign intelligence purposes and that the president may, as he has done, delegate this authority to the attorney general." - Clinton Deputy Attorney General Jamie S. Gorelick, 1994But you sure wouldn't know that from all the hoopla from the media and the mouths of the Dems in pursuit of their anti-everything the administration does and pro-everything to protect and enable Islamofascism.
As Ann Coulter writes in "Live and Let Spy" - "With a huge gaping hole in lower Manhattan, I'm not sure why we have to keep reminding people, but we are at war.
if we must engage in a national debate on half-measures: After 9/11, any president who was not spying on people calling phone numbers associated with terrorists should be impeached for being an inept commander in chief.Borrowing from Ann's vernacular, when we speak of today's Democrats, it seems that we are more and more having to speak of people that live outside the world of normal.With a huge gaping hole in lower Manhattan, I'm not sure why we have to keep reminding people, but we are at war. (Perhaps it's because of the media blackout on images of the 9/11 attack. We're not allowed to see those because seeing planes plowing into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon might make us feel angry and jingoistic.)
Among the things that war entails are: killing people (sometimes innocent), destroying buildings (sometimes innocent) and spying on people (sometimes innocent).
That is why war is a bad thing. But once a war starts, it is going to be finished one way or another, and I have a preference for it coming out one way rather than the other.
In previous wars, the country has done far worse than monitor telephone calls placed to jihad headquarters. FDR rounded up Japanese -- many of them loyal American citizens -- and threw them in internment camps. Most appallingly, at the same time, he let New York Times editors wander free.
Posted by Richard at December 22, 2005 7:29 AM
Articles Related to War on Terror:
- 'Warrantless' searches not unprecedented - Dec 22, 2005
















