« David Kupelian's 'The Marketing of Evil' | Main | Seventeen Children in 24 years ... »
December 14, 2005
Pentagon Finally Waking Up And 'Breaks the Islam Taboo' (Today's 'Must Read')
Topics: Understanding IslamIslam divides offensive jihad into a "three-phase attack strategy" for gaining control of lands for Allah. The first phase is the "Meccan," or weakened, period, whereby a small Muslim minority asserts itself through largely peaceful and political measures involving Islamic NGOs -- such as the Islamic Society of North America, which investigators say has its roots in the militant Muslim Brotherhood, and Muslim pressure groups, such as the Council on American-Islamic Relations, whose leaders are on record expressing their desire to Islamize America. - Pentagon Analysts
Well, it's about time, and you most definitely won't find this in the MSM!
Paul Sperry at FrontPage Magazine.com writes that for the first time, a key Pentagon intelligence agency involved in homeland security is delving into Islam's holy texts to answer whether Islam is being radicalized by the terrorists or is already radical. And so far the conclusions contradict the commonly held notion that Islam is a peaceful religion hijacked or distorted by terrorists.
It seems that the Pentagon has, among other troubling facts, found that the terrorists for the most part are following a war-fighting doctrine articulated through Muhammad in the Quran, elaborated on in the hadiths, codified in Islamic or sharia law, and reinforced by recent interpretations or fatwahs.
"Strategic themes suggest Islam is radical by nature," according to the briefing, which goes on to cite the 26 chapters of the Quran dealing with violent jihad and the examples of the Muslim prophet, who it says sponsored "terror and slaughter" against unbelievers."Muhammad's behaviors today would be defined as radical," the defense document says, and Muslims today are commanded by their "militant" holy book to follow his example. It adds: Western leaders can no longer afford to overlook the "cult characteristics of Islam."
Hearing that from the Pentagon, only now, makes me wonder if they've been living in a complete state of denial.
They've found that the terrorists for the most part are following a war-fighting doctrine articulated through Muhammad in the Quran, elaborated on in the hadiths, codified in Islamic or sharia law, and reinforced by recent interpretations or fatwahs.Now for the really enlightening part - where we learn that the Pentagon finally realizes what has been known for years about all those Muslim charities (like here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and elsewhere)."Strategic themes suggest Islam is radical by nature," according to the briefing, which goes on to cite the 26 chapters of the Quran dealing with violent jihad and the examples of the Muslim prophet, who it says sponsored "terror and slaughter" against unbelievers.
"Muhammad's behaviors today would be defined as radical," the defense document says, and Muslims today are commanded by their "militant" holy book to follow his example. It adds: Western leaders can no longer afford to overlook the "cult characteristics of Islam."
It also ties Muslim charity to war. Zakat, the alms-giving pillar of Islam, is described in the briefing as "an asymmetrical war-fighting funding mechanism." Indeed, authorities have traced millions of dollars received by major jihadi terror groups like Hamas and al-Qaida back to Saudi and other foreign Isamic charities and also U.S. Muslim charities, such as the Holy Land Foundation.
Now continuing with the Pentagon's enlightenment:
It also ties Muslim charity to war. Zakat, the alms-giving pillar of Islam, is described in the briefing as "an asymmetrical war-fighting funding mechanism." Which in English translates to: combat support under the guise of tithing. Of the eight obligatory categories of disbursement of Muslim charitable donations, it notes that two are for funding jihad, or holy war.And now for the actual alarming part...According to the Quran, jihad is not something a Muslim can opt out of. It demands able-bodied believers join the fight. Those unable -- women and the elderly -- are not exempt; they must give "asylum and aid" (Surah 8:74) to those who do fight the unbelievers in the cause of Allah.
In analyzing the threat on the domestic front, the Pentagon briefing draws perhaps its most disturbing conclusions. It argues the U.S. has not suffered from scattered insurgent attacks -- as opposed to the concentrated and catastrophic attack by al-Qaida on 9-11 -- in large part because it has a relatively small Muslim population. But that could change as the Muslim minority grows and gains more influence.
The internal document explains that Islam divides offensive jihad into a "three-phase attack strategy" for gaining control of lands for Allah. The first phase is the "Meccan," or weakened, period, whereby a small Muslim minority asserts itself through largely peaceful and political measures involving Islamic NGOs -- such as the Islamic Society of North America, which investigators say has its roots in the militant Muslim Brotherhood, and Muslim pressure groups, such as the Council on American-Islamic Relations, whose leaders are on record expressing their desire to Islamize America."The defense briefing adds that Islam is also unique in classifying unbelievers as "standing enemies against whom it is legitimate to wage war." " Be sure to read it all!In the second "preparation" phase, a "reasonably influential" Muslim minority starts to turn more militant. The briefing uses Britain and the Netherlands as examples.
And in the final jihad period, or "Medina Stage," a large minority uses its strength of numbers and power to rise up against the majority, as Muslim youth recently demonstrated in terrorizing France, the Pentagon paper notes.
It also notes that unlike Judaism and Christianity, Islam advocates expansion by force. The final command of jihad, as revealed to Muhammad in the Quran, is to conquer the world in the name of Islam.
Posted by Richard at December 14, 2005 12:59 PM
Articles Related to Understanding Islam:
- Robert Spencer Addresses ISNA's Attack On McCain For Calling Islamic Terrorism - Islamic Terrorism - May 01, 2008
- Muslim Woman Suing Over Niqab is Lying To Federal Judge - Apr 30, 2008
- Pakistani Senate condemns Motoons, Fitna, urges UN to take 'all necessary legal, political and administrative steps to curb this trend' - Apr 26, 2008
- More Than 'A Little Unhinged' - Apr 26, 2008
- Muslim Groups Complain About McCain Referring To "Islamic terrorists" As "Islamic Terrorists - Apr 21, 2008
- Book ''Why We Left Islam' may face Muslim wrath - Apr 21, 2008
- Arab And Muslim Countries, With Help From The UN, Are Out To Destroy Our Right Of Free Speech - Apr 18, 2008
- Robert Spencer On Freedom Of Speech In The Age Of Jihad - Apr 13, 2008
- Behold the wisdom (despotic logic) of the Saudi cleric, Muhammad al-Munajid - Apr 12, 2008
- Here's The 'New' Fitna (Updated) - Apr 09, 2008
Comments
Well, maybe this is my opportunity for a career change. I have been saying the same thing since I began to take a keener interest in what these terrorists and Islamofacists are trying to achieve in the name of Allah.
I am not known for my "tolerant" views on the matter, since I believe that Islam could be described as the work of the real Antichrist. (I am a moderate and I find it hard to accept that I am thinking in such terms)
Posted by: Maggie4Life
at December 14, 2005 10:38 PM
It is scary to think that the pentagon is just now figuring this out.
Posted by: Max at December 14, 2005 11:51 PM
Max,
It makes one wonder where they've been living for the past three years, or at the very least, what have they been reading. They certainly haven't been reading the blogosphere, or they'd be a hell of a lot more up to date on Islamofascism and the Islamic agenda. Hyscience alone has posted at least 350 well sourced and linked pieces on Islamist intentions and agenda during the last 12 months, alone.
Posted by: Richard at December 14, 2005 11:59 PM
This site has had some fascinating articles. I've sent this link to over a dozen people (mostly news junkies). I enjoy the straight-forward commentary as much as the articles. It's very refreshing.
Posted by: Max at December 15, 2005 1:20 AM
;















