Only one scientist has explained why the Roe v. Wade generation - women under age 40 in 1973 when abortion became accessible - suffered a more than 40% increase in breast cancer cases between 1987 and 1998. [1] He is Professor Joel Brind, lead author of a 1996 meta-analysis showing that 18 out of 23 studies reported risk increases for women who had abortions. [2] Brind and his colleagues accurately predicted the increase in cases.

"The abortion industry and medical establishment withholds (information about the ABC link) in an attempt to prevent massive lawsuits from being filed....The tsunami of breast cancer cases from the large number of abortions in the 1980s and 1990s has yet to hit," reported an attorney for the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons. [3]

Two U.S. women successfully sued their abortion providers for neglecting to disclose the risks of breast cancer and emotional harm. [4]

"Cancer businesses use fraudulent research to deny the ABC link," said Malec. "Eventually, women will realize that the more money they raise, the more cancer they get. Cancer businesses can't make money by educating women about cancer prevention."

Scientists agree that the best way to prevent the disease is by having more babies, starting before age 24 and breast feeding them longer. [5,6,7] Abortion is incompatible with that goal.

The take home message here is that abortion kills babies, and it can also kill the mothers that thought they were just killing their babies!

Supporting and of interest: Abortion, breast cancer, and informed consent.

Scientific Sources and references are available here (see bottom of page).

Related: Abortion Argument Unravels