CK Rairden, writing for the National Ledger, seems to agree with Sullum:

NARAL did the American voter a huge favor. This ad allows the White house and Roberts' supporters to now correctly point to the lengths that the moonbats on the left will travel to destroy those who wish to rule on law, instead of partaking in judicial activism.

No one, except NARAL (and CNN), appears to be taking the ad seriously.

Unfortunately, CNN did air the ad causing Fidelis, a national Catholic-based advocacy group, to note that while the network agreed to accept the NARAL attack ad on Judge John Roberts, it refused to air a pro-life ad featuring international humanitarian Mother Teresa. In 1998, CNN rejected an ad produced by Right to Life of Michigan featuring a touching interview with Mother Teresa filmed just before her death. At the time, the cable network cited its policy prohibiting "issue advertisements".

Perhaps CNN has changed its policy because the the Christian Broadcast Network (CBN) contacted CNN on Thursday regarding the NARAL ad and was given the following statement: "CNN accepts advocacy advertising from responsible groups from across the political spectrum who wish to express their views and their opinions about issues of public importance."

To summarize, CNN rejected a pro-life advertisement involving Mother Teresa because it was "issue" oriented. CNN, founded by NARAL supporter Ted Turner, runs an obviously false issue-oriented ad placed by NARAL because their policy is to allow expression of views and opinions about "issues".

Related:

NARAL's defense or lack thereof

NARAL defends their refuted commercial

NARAL Ad Misrepresents Roberts

Bloggers Take Down NARAL's Deceptive Commercial

NARAL Faces Possible Conflict of Interest for Robert's Ad